swarnandhra Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 8 hours ago, sonykongara said: 2) Agricultural land below 5 hectare uff. maa village lo 99% of OCs would qualify in this. dry land ayithe ekkuva vuntundemo kani magani side okko family ki 12 acres kante ekkuva ekkada sacchindi anna dammulu andaru vaataalu vesukunte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swarnandhra Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 I hope this does not become law. As couple of others mentioned, what is needed is to #1) make current reservation system equitable by restricting repeat beneficiaries #2) set income limits. #3) Restrict state government from increasing the limits beyond 50%. no exceptions allowed. #4) remove religion based reservation quota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 All papers front page half page paddayi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaswanth526 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 17 minutes ago, Rajakeeyam said: 16 minutes ago, Rajakeeyam said: Thank god pics kanapadatla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VisionaryCBN Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 E drama artist gaudi marketing team ki janalu mamuluga kanipinchadam ledu ga...whatever this idiot does now..he is going to loose PM seat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sskmaestro Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Whatever goes around comes around! eh feku campaign tho ayithey 2014 lo janaalni ullu ni chesadu.... dame feku campaign is gonna sink him and his party! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahen_Nfan Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Implement cheste Super... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaitra Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Even if u implement,we won't vote for u feku. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 LS disco going on, will pass easily Shiv Sena, TMC, BJD, TRS, LJP, CPM (in principal), NCP, SP among parties backing quota Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 The Congress, which initially indicated it would support the bill, today said it would prefer a parliamentary committee to look into the matter. The shift drew a reality check from Union Minister Arun Jaitley, who pointed out that in its manifesto, the party supported the issue. The opposition, he said, "faces test whether they support advancement of economically backward sections only for the manifesto or here in the house as well". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rajakeeyam Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 The bill was passed with 323 lawmakers voting for it and only three voting against. Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- whose cabinet cleared the bill last evening -- and Congress chief Rahul Gandhi were present in the house for the voting. Neither had participated in the debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saichandra Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Rajakeeyam said: The bill was passed with 323 lawmakers voting for it and only three voting against. Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- whose cabinet cleared the bill last evening -- and Congress chief Rahul Gandhi were present in the house for the voting. Neither had participated in the debate. Court lo nilabadiddi anukuntunnara bro?naku ayite 1% kuda nammakam ledu,sc kottestadi anipistundi,previous judgement chuste clear ga undi economic backwardness tho reservation ivvakudadu ani 92 judgement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 idi PV 95 lo introduce chesadu ani jaitley telling, some one will move to court and they will drag for another century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phani2 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Vaadu biscuit veyyatam, ikkada janaalu voogi povatam......bhale undih comedy. Vaadiki nijam ga icche uddesam unte last day of the session lo pedataada? rajyasabha lo 2/3 majority tho pass cheyyagalara? No one will oppose directy it but definitely will oppose in the way of amendments. Everystate has their own commitments on reservations....like kapu in AP, muslim in TG etc. Ivi solve cheyyakunda yela pass avuddhi? For political reasons they will oppose it for sure. Take case of Kachara, would he prefer muslim reservation or EBC? Same applies to kapu reservation in AP. Tamilnadu already has 69% reservation. Ila list cheppukuntu pothe chaala undhi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krishna_Bidda Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 4 hours ago, Bollu said: idi PV 95 lo introduce chesadu ani jaitley telling, some one will move to court and they will drag for another century. Court cannot over ride constitutional amendment as per my knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swarnandhra Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 court can overrule constitutional amendment if it is against fundamental article/rights given in the constitution. For e.g. constitutional amendment is made to remove voting right to women (just an example). courts can easily overrule that amendment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kishbab Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Reservations originally meant for social backwardness not about financial backwardness as per constitution But still constitution is not by God and it written by humans and we are not bonded slaves to that or makers of that It is only rule book written by us and it can be amended at any time as per requirements and peoples house I.e parliament has every right to change it So constitution assembly or old parliament thinks reservation for social backward, current people house I.e current parliment thinks it is for economical backwardness After few years demands to apply this to sc/st,bc reservations also.slowly gravitation moves to economical backwardness and caste quota should be removed and only ebc irrespective of caste and religion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swarnandhra Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Constitution is not a god given document and also it is not a movie script written on trash paper. Even if given by God, which god, whose God? not every one believes in same God. amendment can't change basic structure/fundamental rights. It is like you build ground floor of a house with pillar/basement with strength to bear 2 floors. You can't just increase the pillar size of first floor and build 2nd floor. You got to change basement and ground floor too. or demolish and whole structure build a new one (new constitution). no constitution in the world is written by parliament/similar representative body directly. That is for a reason. Usually, some sort of group drawn from entire spectrum of the country (some politicians, some intellectuals, ...etc) does that. Parliament only approves/disapproves such document. not just parliament by the way, even states has to approve some critical amendments related to federal system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krishna_Bidda Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 No court can over ride if passed with 2/3 majority..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krishna_Bidda Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 It has to be passed in atleast half of the state assemblies which is easy for Bjp....worst case change chief justice and they will pass it ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonykongara Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 58 minutes ago, krishna_Bidda said: No court can over ride if passed with 2/3 majority..... nenu ade anukuntunna, kani JP court ki pothndi annadu ade ardam kala Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swarnandhra Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, sonykongara said: nenu ade anukuntunna, kani JP court ki pothndi annadu ade ardam kala 2/3 is the minimum required to pass amendment. even 100% support vunna it does not matter. It has to be inline with the other higher tenets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonykongara Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 nenu EBC ni kanu ,ma brother EBC avutadu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chanti149 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello26 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 Election stunt ...Another biscuit. Dont keep unnecessary hopes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello26 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 So, if this gets implemented then children of most of us over here will have to fight with other candidates from OCs, EBCs, BCs, SCs and STs for the non-reserved 40% which was 50% earlier. So, more injustice for our children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.