Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nfan from 1982 Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 1 minute ago, Raaz@NBK said: Brother, You updated similarly for RRR case proceedings at SC in this DB and I followed your updates He got bail from SC. Manhandling helped him a lot to get the bail IMO Lets see what happens today. Hoping best 🙏 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 1 minute ago, Nfan from 1982 said: Brother, You updated similarly for RRR case proceedings at SC in this DB and I followed your updates He got bail from SC. Manhandling helped him a lot to get the bail IMO Lets see what happens today. Hoping best 🙏 Hope for the best.. 🙏 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannam Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Just now, Raaz@NBK said: Our lawyers argued that the time of FIR need to be considered for 17A purposes whereas their lawyers are arguing that the time of issue happened must be considered to apply 17A provisions to arrest a public servant. It looks like both have precedents. Let us see which one upholds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nfan from 1982 Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 1 minute ago, mannam said: Our lawyers argued that the time of FIR need to be considered for 17A purposes whereas their lawyers are arguing that the time of issue happened must be considered to apply 17A provisions to arrest a public servant. It looks like both have precedents. Let us see which one upholds. We have to remember that case was put up by crooked minded politicians behind with a deep plan and workouts It’s not easy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajanani Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 2 minutes ago, Raaz@NBK said: ఇదే డౌట్ కొడుతోంది నాకు Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannam Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 6 minutes ago, Raaz@NBK said: Now they are arguing that the case is nascent and needs time to investigate and showing a precedent that the courts can’t quash the remand or arrest petitions until the investigation is complete and a complete chargesheet is filed which we know will take forever as the CID will seek extensions to the deadline every time. My feeling is that the court will postpone the arguments for another 2 weeks and asks the concerned agencies to provide the report within that time. I hope I am wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarakrkzzzz Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 2 minutes ago, rajanani said: ఇదే డౌట్ కొడుతోంది నాకు If that is the case, how can someone be arrested without proper evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siddhugwotham Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 17 minutes ago, Nfan from 1982 said: Brother, You updated similarly for RRR case proceedings at SC in this DB and I followed your updates He got bail from SC. Manhandling helped him a lot to get the bail IMO Lets see what happens today. Hoping best 🙏 Yes!! I rememeber that day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannam Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 5 minutes ago, mannam said: Now they are arguing that the case is nascent and needs time to investigate and showing a precedent that the courts can’t quash the remand or arrest petitions until the investigation is complete and a complete chargesheet is filed which we know will take forever as the CID will seek extensions to the deadline every time. My feeling is that the court will postpone the arguments for another 2 weeks and asks the concerned agencies to provide the report within that time. I hope I am wrong. It seems Jagan read the entire criminal procedure code while in jail and locked CBN in a crucial period. If court orders that they need report from CID before quashing the case, we know it will take forever. It may be better to seek bail, but it may not be politically helpful. Time to start looking at alternatives for campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kishbab Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Gvt transferred money to private company account? I think it should be joint account.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eswar09 Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 2 minutes ago, mannam said: It seems Jagan read the entire criminal procedure code while in jail and locked CBN in a crucial period. If court orders that they need report from CID before quashing the case, we know it will take forever. It may be better to seek bail, but it may not be politically helpful. Time to start looking at alternatives for campaign. Vadu ee 4.5 years bayataki raakunda intlo kurnchuni chesina pani kudaa edhe ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charperone Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 Do they have proof that CBN sanctioned to set up the so called shell companies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charperone Posted September 19, 2023 Share Posted September 19, 2023 The case is weak unless they have documents proof that CBN sanctioned those shell companies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.