15 minutes ago, Raaz@NBK said:

kasepu ikkada updates ivvu uncle.. I will come back 👍

Ok

Kumar: In Section 161 statement, the accused have taken a stand that the agreement was placed before them to merely sign

 

 

all the above points are an issue with the documentation/govt procedures....so what is the scam here

Edited September 19, 20232 yr by balayyatheking

Kumar: Everything that was required to happen has not happened. And in the counter how the financial notices were overruled have been mentioned in a chart form

Their strategy is, give few specific details and rest of the argument as vague. This way they may ask for more time. 

 

 

Kumar reading from Case diary- there is no verification. And these are amounts given in 2015-2016 (prior to 2018 PCA Amendment)
 

40 minutes ago, Raaz@NBK said:

Documents levu Ani oppukunnaru thanks.. 🙏

kothaga oppukovadam endi masteruuu...first nunchi aallu chephtundi adega, we dont have evidence, we need to investigate to get evidences ani

Kumar refers to Priti Saraf Vs. State Of NCT Of Delhi

8 minutes ago, PHANI_NTR said:

Kumar: Everything that was required to happen has not happened. And in the counter how the financial notices were overruled have been mentioned in a chart form

oreyy evarra meerantha..

4 minutes ago, narens said:

kothaga oppukovadam endi masteruuu...first nunchi aallu chephtundi adega, we dont have evidence, we need to investigate to get evidences ani

ACB court lo vunnai Ani chepparu ga..

Kumar reads:

"to exercise powers under Section 482 CrPC, the complaint in its entirety shall have to be examined on the basis of the allegation and High Court not under obligation to examine its correctness."

Salve interjects: Please turn to section 17A. I was almost surprised to hear that this doesn't relate to decisions or recommendations made...

11 minutes ago, balayyatheking said:

all the above points are an issue with the documentation/govt procedures....so what is the scam here

 

 

 

37 minutes ago, yamaha said:

K srinivasa reddy 

Inka light tesukondi folks.......

Respected Judge gara ….

idi telika updates kosam choosthuna

inka enduku Kangaru nayame gelusthundi 

Salve on 17A: Right from saying he (Naidu) is the one that passed an order, he appointed his henchman as a chairman. That is (official) decision. He is the one who made the negotiations, that is the charge

Salve: Nobody has a vested right in procedure. Any FIR post 2018 needs to comply with 17A

 

 

Salve: One ground is, if a reading of the FIR shows that no allegation was shown, the might of the State cannot  be used to put somebody down

Salve: The arguments by other side were like two ships passing in the night, we made one argument, they replied to something else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salve: Central agency approved the valuation. State is trying to show price of screwdrivers, etc. What is of importance is that 6 institutions are up and running

2 minutes ago, akhil ch said:

 

 

 

 

🤪

Salve: Siemens did a project in Gujarat. State says somebody suggested a pilot project. How does that make a difference? The project went as planned.

Salve: I read the agreement that shows our share and their share. They did not need to give anything in cash. The project was successful, it was delivered. 90% was in kind.

Salve: What design tech might have done to save taxes is where the problem started, to involve the petitioner is malafide. That's our case.

They are up and running and the students are being trained. This is the highlight of all.