Venkatpaladugu 410 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Evaro mahanubavudu. .ilanti policy maker.. Impact ayye vallu Chala thakkuva .mqndi vuntaru .but it's very bad ... Link to post Share on other sites
kanagalakiran 254 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Venkatpaladugu said: Evaro mahanubavudu. .ilanti policy maker.. Impact ayye vallu Chala thakkuva .mqndi vuntaru .but it's very bad ... Still…. Desam kosam….Dharmam kosam…. Link to post Share on other sites
NatuGadu 1,723 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 2.5L interest vachhe vallu evaru mana db lo Link to post Share on other sites
Suresh_Ongole 128 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 18 minutes ago, NatuGadu said: 2.5L interest vachhe vallu evaru mana db lo Not interest bro. If deposit more than 2.5L that will move to another account. Dani meda vache interest amount ki tax kattali. May be normal employees may not effect with this. Link to post Share on other sites
surendra.g 230 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 1 minute ago, Suresh_Ongole said: Not interest bro. If deposit more than 2.5L that will move to another account. Dani meda vache interest amount ki tax kattali. May be normal employees may not effect with this. Is it employee only contribution? or employee contribution + employer contribution? If it is including both, considerable employees will get impacted! (Remember there were employees who chooses VPF to contibute) 2,50,000/12 = 20833/mo ~= 10,000/mo employee contribution Link to post Share on other sites
Suresh_Ongole 128 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 2 minutes ago, surendra.g said: Is it employee only contribution? or employee contribution + employer contribution? If it is including both, considerable employees will get impacted! (Remember there were employees who chooses VPF to contibute) 2,50,000/12 = 20833/mo ~= 10,000/mo employee contribution It's including both employee and employer contribution. In this case how employee will benefited? I don't understand your logic bro. Link to post Share on other sites
surendra.g 230 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Suresh_Ongole said: It's including both employee and employer contribution. In this case how employee will benefited? I don't understand your logic bro. Impacted, not benifited. If it is considering both components more employees will get impacted. Link to post Share on other sites
Surap83 3 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 no its only Employee contribution more than 2.5L.... employer contribution not considered.... Link to post Share on other sites
surendra.g 230 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Surap83 said: no its only Employee contribution more than 2.5L.... employer contribution not considered.... No Clarity bro, Could not find anything on it in google. Can you post if it is clarified somewhere? Link to post Share on other sites
Sunny@CBN 394 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Impact ayye janalu chala takkuva. And govt ki vachedi kuda chala takkuva. Basically it is like discouraging PF savings. Generally avi long term savings kabatti positive for economy. Vallu iche 8% return ki malli tax ... Link to post Share on other sites
Sunny@CBN 394 Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 Last 8 years Central govt baadude badudu. Evadi dagara ela gunjudama. UP, Gujarat ki divert cheddama ani alochanalu tappa em ledu Link to post Share on other sites
kanagalakiran 254 Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 The employer contributes 12% of basic salary plus dearness allowance to EPF and deducts another 12% from the employee’s salary; 8.33% of the employer contribution goes to Employees Pension Scheme (EPS). Link to post Share on other sites
kanagalakiran 254 Posted April 2 Share Posted April 2 Employee Provident Fund (EPF) payments over Rs 2.5 lakh per year would be taxed, according to a notification published on August 31. This limit will be Rs 5 lakh per year for PF accounts when employers do not contribute. seems 2.5L only from employee contribution Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.