raaz Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 encounter 1st charge sheet was submitted by CBI.. Can politically drag Modi into it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted July 3, 2013 Author Share Posted July 3, 2013 Ishrat Jahan, 3 others were killed in cold blood by Gujarat Police: CBI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted July 3, 2013 Author Share Posted July 3, 2013 19 year old Ishrat jahan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted July 3, 2013 Author Share Posted July 3, 2013 In its first chargesheet in the Ishrat Jahan encounter case, the Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday said the 19-year-old girl along with three others - Pranesh Pillai alias Javed Sheikh, Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar - was killed in cold blood by the Gujarat Police on June 15, 2004. The CBI also told a court in Ahmedabad that the agency has evidence to prove that the four were illegally detained and kept in confinement. It added that Ishrat and the three others were tranquilized before being killed. The chargesheet, however, remained silent on whether the four were terrorists. The Gujarat Police had claimed that Ishrat and three others were a part of a Lashkar-e-Toiba module which was planning to assassinate state Chief Minister Narendra Modi. But the CBI made it clear that it has found no evidence which can establish that they had come to Gujarat to kill Modi. The CBI in its chargesheet said that Ishrat along and three others was tranquilized before being killed on June 15, 2004.. The investigative agency named eight Gujarat police officers including absconding Additional DGP PP Pandey, suspended DIG DG Vanzara, suspended IPS officer GL Singhal charging them with criminal conspiracy, abduction, wrongful confinement and murder. "The encounter was a joint operation between Gujarat Police and Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (SIB) of the state," the CBI said in the chargesheet, adding "the encounter was fake". The CBI said Vanzara and other Gujarat police officers collected weapons from the Intelligence Bureau (IB) office and then planted them on Ishrat and others. The chargesheet says on Vanzara's instructions, suspended Singhal went to the IB office on June 14 and collected a bag of weapons used in the encounter. According to the CBI, IB officer Rajinder Kumar was heading state investigation bureau during the period when the encounter was carried out. But he has not been named in the chargesheet. Investigation is going on against four Intelligence Bureau officers, including its Special Director Rajendra Kumar, and three other officers - P Mittal, MK Sinha and Rajiv Wankhede, it said. A supplementary chargesheet would be filed against IB officers once the investigation was over, the court was told by the CBI. The investigative agency also told the court that Gujarat Police officers were deployed in different places in the name of nakabandi (pickets) in Ahmedabad to manage the encounter. But the biggest relief has come for the Gujarat Chief Minister and his aide Amit Shah as the CBI has not named them in its chargesheet. The CBI chargesheet also says that Kumar and Pandey interacted with Ishrat and Javed at Khodiyar farm a few days before the encounter which conclusively proves that she was abducted by Gujarat Police officers NK Amin and Tarun Barot from Vasad toll booth. CBI's mandate in this case was to find out whether the encounter was fake or not. But while the CBI has concluded the encounter was fake, by not fixing any accountability on any other wing barring the police and IB, It has left enough room for politicians to continue to spar with each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbbaiG Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 We love them terrorists. Fcuk it. Lets hang the xxx who shot down the mumbai terrorists too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted July 3, 2013 Author Share Posted July 3, 2013 truth speaks for itself from the rooftop" and claimed that the Chief Minister's role in such encounters will also be exposed. "He (Modi) will also be exposed some time. Truth comes out at one point or the other. Truth speaks for itself from the rooftop. Someday, you will come to know of the real face of the Gujarat Chief Minister," AICC General Secretary Madhusudan Mistri said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaitra Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Kukkal ni kalchi nattu kalchi paara dobbandi isumanti desa drohulani Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted July 3, 2013 Author Share Posted July 3, 2013 The Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday alleged that the Central Bureau of Investigation has underplayed the role of the Lashkar-e-Toiba in the Ishrat Jahan encounter case. The investigative agency on Wednesday filed its first chargesheet in the case and said Ishrat Jahan and three others were killed by the Gujarat Police in a fake encounter. Reacting to it, BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman said it's surprising the CBI has not revealed anything about the background of the people who were killed in the encounter by the police on June 15, 2004. She also alleged that the government might be giving regular instructions to the CBI on the case and therefore the agency is confused on which way to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted July 3, 2013 Author Share Posted July 3, 2013 Here are key facts about the encounters and the people involved in the case. June 15, 2004: Ishrat Jahan, Javed Sheikh, Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar killed in a police encounter on the outskirts of Ahmedabad. The police claim they were members of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba on a mission to kill Gujarat CM Narendra Modi. People invovled Ishrat Jahan: A college girl from Mumbra, Maharashtra, she belonged to a lower middle class family. Second of seven siblings, Ishrat became the breadwinner of the family after her father’s death in 2002. Pranesh Pillai alias Javed Sheikh: A Mumbai-based petty criminal involved in counterfeit currency and smuggling, he was friends with Ishrat. Amjad Ali Rana: Reportedly a Pakistani national but there's no documentary evidence to prove it. His identity remains a mystery. Zeeshan Johar: Reportedly a Pakistani national but no one claimed his and Amjad Ali’s Modies after they were killed. Zeeshan is said to have been handed over to Gujarat police by IB officials before the encounter. Before the encounter On June 11, 2004, Ishrat left for Nashik with Javed. Later that day and the day after, she called her mother from Nashik. It is not known how she came to be found in Gujarat on June 15 when she was supposed to be in Maharashtra. A controversial case Sept 2009: Ahmedabad metropolitan magistrate SP Tamang calls the encounter fake. Aug 2010: Gujarat HC asks Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by former CBI director RK Raghavan, to take up the case. Sept 2010: The HC constitutes a new SIT after the Raghavan-headed SIT expresses its inability to undertake the probe. Nov 2010: SC rejects Gujarat government’s plea challenging the HC order to form a new SIT. Dec 2010: A three-member SIT begins investigation and starts recording statements of witnesses, police officials involved in the case. Jan 2011: SIT member Satish Varma files an affidavit stating the encounter was fake. He also accuses the other two members of not allowing the probe to be conducted in an unbiased manner Dec 2011: Gujarat HC orders CBI to probe the case. Feb 2013: CBI makes its first arrest, Gujarat IPS GL Singhal. May 2013: CBI court issues an arrest warrant against Gujarat's ADG PP Pande while the CBI summons IB special director Rajinder Kumar for interrogation June 2013: • CBI arrests IPS officer DG Vanzara from jail. • It also removes IPS Satish Verma from its probe team. Verma was a nominee of Ishrat’s mother in the SIT formed by the Gujarat HC. • While the CBI says it has proof that Rajinder Kumar was involved in the fake encounter, the IB defends him. • Gujarat HC dismissed petition of additional DG PP Pande, who wanted the CBI FIR quashed in the case. Pande was earlier declared absconder by a special CBI court. July 2013: • CBI is set to file preliminary charge sheet in the case on July 3rd. It is set to name Gujarat cops who executed the encounter. • The ministry of home affairs (MHA) tells CBI it has not sanctioned the prosecution of the IB official in the case. The CBI has reportedly agreed to let the official retire on July 31st before naming him in the case. Findings of the SIT and the CBI • The detailed probe first by the SIT and subsequently by the CBI did not find any link between the dead and the LeT. • One AK 47 and ammunition reportedly recovered from the dead turned out to have been planted by the Ahmedabad police. • The CBI investigation revealed that two persons killed with Ishrat and Javed were associated with secessionists groups in Kashmir. • The CBI probe also revealed that three of the four persons were in prior custody of police before they were killed in a 'staged' encounter. • Further, the probe revealed that the IB official’s role was not limited to generating false intelligence alert that facilitated the encounter. The CBI had noted that the official was an integral part of the conspiracy and also supplied an AK 47 rifle that was planted on the deceased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbbaiG Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 truth speaks for itself from the rooftop" and claimed that the Chief Minister's role in such encounters will also be exposed. "He (Modi) will also be exposed some time. Truth comes out at one point or the other. Truth speaks for itself from the rooftop. Someday, you will come to know of the real face of the Gujarat Chief Minister," AICC General Secretary Madhusudan Mistri said. lol Abishek Singhvi gaadu inthakanna bari teginchi matladevaadu. Ippudu sammaga intlo kookuni guitar vaayinchukuntunnadu. Tvaralo eedu anthe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krishna_Bidda Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Ee kukkalu morigina truth prevails Modi will come out clean .....Jai NAMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anne Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 namo did a good thing namo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saileshgogineni Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 Was david headely in custody of gujju police????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saileshgogineni Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 What diff does it make in fake encounter or real when they were group of terrorirsts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOLI SODA Posted July 4, 2013 Share Posted July 4, 2013 It was good to kill them But encounter is not legal kadha So konchem gola chestharu anthe Encounter even YSR cheyinchadu ga Its okay as long as culprits r not innocent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.