satya Posted January 27 Posted January 27 6 hours ago, PP SIMHA said: agreed ! @yamaha oka example , he is succesgful enterprenuer and iit grad. manodiyto kasepu matladite energise avutam gem !! Nuvvu ila posts veyyi, avir emo andariki call chesi na gurunchi revanth post vesadu chusava ani adugutunadu
PP SIMHA Posted January 27 Posted January 27 33 minutes ago, satya said: Nuvvu ila posts veyyi, avir emo andariki call chesi na gurunchi revanth post vesadu chusava ani adugutunadu
Husker Posted January 28 Posted January 28 On 1/27/2025 at 10:21 AM, satya said: mee sirruuuu about AI
uma Posted January 30 Posted January 30 20Lakhs fasak anta gaa...ahaa.....news lo cheptunnaru anthe....
sreentr Posted January 30 Posted January 30 19 minutes ago, uma said: 20Lakhs fasak anta gaa...ahaa.....news lo cheptunnaru anthe.... News channels ki pani ledu emi ledu orike edo ala rudditunaru
uma Posted January 30 Posted January 30 17 minutes ago, sreentr said: News channels ki pani ledu emi ledu orike edo ala rudditunaru vallaki full news next 4 yrs uncle....final gaa veedantha yedava president ippatidaaka US ki leru ani prove chesi potaadu... NTR2727 1
TarakMokshu99 Posted January 30 Posted January 30 1 hour ago, uma said: vallaki full news next 4 yrs uncle....final gaa veedantha yedava president ippatidaaka US ki leru ani prove chesi potaadu... Vaadu yedava ayithe malla enduku vastadu half people happy e anukunta
uma Posted January 30 Posted January 30 20 minutes ago, TarakMokshu99 said: Vaadu yedava ayithe malla enduku vastadu half people happy e anukunta so half people kudaa yedava le annamaata...but vaadu yedava to the power of yedava.....kaani jaggad antha yedava kaadu... ravindras and NTR2727 2
goldenstar Posted February 4 Posted February 4 https://x.com/eenadulivenews/status/1886596028671123548
kurnool NTR Posted March 6 Posted March 6 Current status as answered by GROK Currently, the executive order is on hold, pending further legal proceedings. Legal scholars widely agree that only a constitutional amendment—requiring a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states—could definitively end birthright citizenship, a process considered politically unfeasible given the current national divide. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on this specific challenge, but precedents like Wong Kim Ark and Plyler v. Doe (1982) strongly support the traditional interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Posts on X and web sources indicate ongoing debate, with some advocating that the amendment was never intended to apply to undocumented immigrants, but these views lack judicial backing as of now. In practice, children born on U.S. soil today continue to receive citizenship at birth, as the executive order’s implementation remains blocked. The order, by its own terms, would only apply to births occurring after February 19, 2025, but with courts intervening, no changes have taken effect. The situation remains fluid, with potential for escalation to the Supreme Court, though no definitive timeline exists yet. Thus, birthright citizenship stands intact under the Constitution, upheld by courts, and unaffected by the stalled executive action as of this date.
NTR2727 Posted March 6 Posted March 6 5 hours ago, kurnool NTR said: Current status as answered by GROK Currently, the executive order is on hold, pending further legal proceedings. Legal scholars widely agree that only a constitutional amendment—requiring a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states—could definitively end birthright citizenship, a process considered politically unfeasible given the current national divide. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on this specific challenge, but precedents like Wong Kim Ark and Plyler v. Doe (1982) strongly support the traditional interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Posts on X and web sources indicate ongoing debate, with some advocating that the amendment was never intended to apply to undocumented immigrants, but these views lack judicial backing as of now. In practice, children born on U.S. soil today continue to receive citizenship at birth, as the executive order’s implementation remains blocked. The order, by its own terms, would only apply to births occurring after February 19, 2025, but with courts intervening, no changes have taken effect. The situation remains fluid, with potential for escalation to the Supreme Court, though no definitive timeline exists yet. Thus, birthright citizenship stands intact under the Constitution, upheld by courts, and unaffected by the stalled executive action as of this date. All his executive orders will be slapped back … cheppu penta lo munchi kodthadi Supreme Court … Deniki matram his gorre followers in db won’t comment .. ego kada … tappadhu papam gorrelaki
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now