AnnaGaru Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 అవును జగన్ కెసిఆర్ తో కలిసి పోరాడి ఆంధ్ర ప్రయోయోజనాలు బాగా కాపాడతాడు.. కెసిఆర్ ఆంధ్ర లో పోలవరం మీద కేసు వేసాడు ... ప్రకాశం,గుంటూరు జీవనాడి గోదావరి-పెన్నా మీద కంప్లైంట్ చేసి కేసు వేశారు... విజయ్ సాయిరెడ్డి "డేటా తెఫ్ట్" ఆక్షన్ ప్లాన్ రోజునే(21-FEB-19) జగన్ బ్యాచ్ తాము దర్జా గ పెట్టుకున్న/చేస్తున్న "కాళేశ్వరం" ప్రాజెక్ట్ వివరాలు లేపేశారు... ఆంధ్ర ప్రజల కళ్ళు భలే కప్పేశారు.. శ్రీశైలం నుంచి 80 టీఎంసీ లిఫ్ట్ చేసే 80 టీఎంసీ పాలమూరు-రంగారెడ్డి ప్రాజెక్ట్ కూడా వీళ్లదే కెసిఆర్ తో మాకు సంబంధం లేదు అని చెప్పుకోవటానికి తహతహ లాడుతున్నారు అన్ని డిలీట్ చేసుకుంటూ The day(21-Feb) when Vijay Sai reddy initiated "data theft action plan" with KCR, Jagan batch started to remove their LINKS with KCR... KALESWARAM works are done by Peddiramachandra reddy company PLR projects...They removed that page on 21-Feb-19 as it will effect election chances.... ఎంత దురదృష్టం చేసుకుంటేనే చిత్తూర్ ప్రజలకి గతి పడుతుంది ...దేశం లోనే అతి కరువు ప్రాంతం రాయలసీమ కి ఆ ప్రాంతం YSRCP MLA చావు బాజా రాస్తునాడు .... పాలమూరు-రంగారెడ్డి ప్రాజెక్ట్ కూడా వీళ్లదే.. - http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EoIYdDUg9CMJ:www.plrprojects.com/irrigation.html+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnnaGaru Posted March 11, 2019 Author Share Posted March 11, 2019 Kaleswaram,palamuru-rangareddy kadutunna eyana Andhra Kharma khalite IRRIGATION minister post ki top runner YSRCP tarupuna https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/When-the-contractor-became-environment-minister/articleshow/6289863.cms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RKumar Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 Peddireddy Ramachandra Reddy Party maarakapovadaaniki main reason funding from KCR & Telangana govt. through irrigation projects. Adi AP ki bad chesina sare no issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnnaGaru Posted March 12, 2019 Author Share Posted March 12, 2019 ఒక పక్క మన గోదావరి-పెన్నా మీద ఏడుస్తూ , శ్రీశైలం నుంచి కృష్ణ నీళ్లు రంగారెడ్డి(80 TMC) కి తరలించే ప్రాజెక్ట్ నిర్మాత వైస్సార్సీపీ పెద్దిరెడ్డి(see above for contract details KCR has gifted)... ఆంధ్ర మీద పట్టు తో పాటు నోరెత్తకుండా చేస్తున్న కెసిఆర్ చాణుక్యం అనుకోవాలా లేక ఆంధ్ర ఖర్మ న ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rama123 Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 Almatti contractors andhra vallega Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RKumar Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 ilaanti vaallani ennukuntunna prajaladi thappu. veellaki vaalla self business interests thappa prajala baagogulu pattavu. Ee Peddireddy putraratnam-Mithun Reddy 40% attendance in Parliament, shame on such MPs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 palamuru - rangareddy katte badhulu , pranahitha-chevella kattunte baagundedhi. kaneesam kaleshwaram capacity penchukuni pranahita+indravathi water ni divert chesukunnaa saripoyedhi. krishna lo water levu ani telisi palamuru-rangareddy start chesaadu. veedu chese panulu naaku manchi jaragakapoyinaa paravaledhu, edutivaadu nasanam ayyipovaali anelaa vunnaayi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 contractor tappu emundhi . vaadu kaakapothe verevaadu chesthaadu. kcr dhi wrong decision to construct palamuru rangareddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnnaGaru Posted March 12, 2019 Author Share Posted March 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, ravindras said: contractor tappu emundhi . vaadu kaakapothe verevaadu chesthaadu. kcr dhi wrong decision to construct palamuru rangareddy oho...YSCRP leaders tana sontha JILLA&AREA(punganuru,madanapalle his place is worst drought area in India) ki vastunna water divert chesi oakkada marana mrudangam project kadite tappu ledu...ok... meeku inko vishayam telusua...A dabbule release chesaru illu noru ettakunda T meda...inku enduku dasoham andam manm kuda TRS ki... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/doubts-over-palamururr-lift-irrigation-scheme/article8270455.ece https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/what-project-redesigning-means-to-rr/article8012298.ece Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rama123 Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, ravindras said: contractor tappu emundhi . vaadu kaakapothe verevaadu chesthaadu. kcr dhi wrong decision to construct palamuru rangareddy Palamyr ki funds apa kaleswarM ki pamparumallee ippudu palamyr anta vedhava.veedu polavaram ki kuda water ranivvadu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, rama123 said: Almatti contractors andhra vallega andhra contractors pan india . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 palamuru rangareddy ni kcr gadu jurala place nundi srisailam ki shift chesadu, so manaki idi pedda bokka ayyela undi. 1.5 tmc anta daily pumping so it's a big loss to AP. e okka issue lone ap tg to kalisi unte bagundu ani pinchedi. any how evaru unna emi cheyagaligedi ledu, peddy reddy contract vachindi kada, nemmadi ga danni drag chesthe another 4-5 years that help is enough, kani vadu money kosam tondaraga chesthadu. we can't do much ani, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnnaGaru Posted March 12, 2019 Author Share Posted March 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Bollu said: palamuru rangareddy ni kcr gadu jurala place nundi srisailam ki shift chesadu, so manaki idi pedda bokka ayyela undi. 1.5 tmc anta daily pumping so it's a big loss to AP. e okka issue lone ap tg to kalisi unte bagundu ani pinchedi. any how evaru unna emi cheyagaligedi ledu, peddy reddy contract vachindi kada, nemmadi ga danni drag chesthe another 4-5 years that help is enough, kani vadu money kosam tondaraga chesthadu. we can't do much ani, Total handri neeva benefit will be wiped off with this project.......SEEMA will become worse than before... Noru ettakudade a project kuda YSRCP vallaki ichadu... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, AnnaGaru said: oho...YSCRP leaders tana sontha JILLA&AREA(punganuru,madanapalle his place is worst drought area in India) ki vastunna water divert chesi oakkada marana mrudangam project kadite tappu ledu...ok... meeku inko vishayam telusua...A dabbule release chesaru illu noru ettakunda T meda...inku enduku dasoham andam manm kuda TRS ki... business and politics are separate. if this contractor won't takeup work , other contractor will construct through e-tendering . andhra contractors take works all over india. projects in karnataka & maharashtra also constructed by andhra contractors which affect flows to ap. we need to argue before kwdt properly to get our rightful share . crying won't help us. kwdt gave judgement in favour of karnataka to raise almatti dam height . if alamatti dam height work doesnt takeup by andhra contractors , some other state contractors will takeup that work. nobody can stop there is no dearth of contractors in india. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rama123 Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 Okkate solution stop tunga basta to reach srisailam elagu almatti height penchi te water raavu srisailam ki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RKumar Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 1 minute ago, ravindras said: business and politics are separate. if this contractor won't takeup work , other contractor will construct through e-tendering . andhra contractors take works all over india. projects in karnataka & maharashtra also constructed by andhra contractors which affect flows to ap. we need to argue before kwdt properly to get our rightful share . crying won't help us. kwdt gave judgement in favour of karnataka to raise almatti dam height . if alamatti dam height work doesnt takeup by andhra contractors , some other state contractors will takeup that work. nobody can stop there is no dearth of contractors in india. Adi correct ee kaani nee sontha prajalu taage saagu chesukune neetine dongathanam ga vere vaallaki ivvadam telisi telisi ghoram kada. Rayalaseema Drohulu - Peddireddy Ramachandra Reddy, Peddireddy Mithun Reddy & Jagan Reddys Intha drohaniki telisi telisi evaru odigadathaaru? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, AnnaGaru said: Total handri neeva benefit will be wiped off with this project.......SEEMA will become worse than before... Noru ettakudade a project kuda YSRCP vallaki ichadu... yes, if there is no flood means there is no water for handri neeva, plus a motors pani cheyali ante entha height lo water store ayyi undali anedi techincal documentation mee daggara emina unda? vadu 1.5 tmc draw chesthe manam pothyreddy padu daggara 4 tmc draw cheychhu, through veligonda 1 tmc, handri neeva 3000 cusecs, so we can draw minimum of 5 tmc in a day, srisalam will be empty in a month even if it stored in full level. manaki unna oke oka option divert tungabadhra water to rayalseema with out reaching the srisailam project, anduke mana vallu vedavathi, gundrevala, siddeswaram ki tenders call chesaru,but avi interstate issues kabatti we can't move a head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, RKumar said: Adi correct ee kaani nee sontha prajalu taage saagu chesukune neetine dongathanam ga vere vaallaki ivvadam telisi telisi ghoram kada. Rayalaseema Drohulu - Peddireddy Ramachandra Reddy, Peddireddy Mithun Reddy & Jagan Reddys Intha drohaniki telisi telisi evaru odigadathaaru? self interest is primary interest . in general people care about I -> family -> friends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, ravindras said: business and politics are separate. if this contractor won't takeup work , other contractor will construct through e-tendering . andhra contractors take works all over india. projects in karnataka & maharashtra also constructed by andhra contractors which affect flows to ap. we need to argue before kwdt properly to get our rightful share . crying won't help us. kwdt gave judgement in favour of karnataka to raise almatti dam height . if alamatti dam height work doesnt takeup by andhra contractors , some other state contractors will takeup that work. nobody can stop there is no dearth of contractors in india. KWDT award vachina first srisalam lo water undali kada manam draw cheyataniki, flood vasthane we have hopes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Bollu said: KWDT award vachina first srisalam lo water undali kada manam draw cheyataniki, flood vasthane we have hopes. once kwdt gives judgement , projects based on nagarjunasagar & srisailam will be controlled by krmb(center) with cisf/crpf protection. krmb release water according to kwdt allocation. i agree that first we need to get water from karnataka to srisailam . once almatti raised its storage capaicity increase from 123 tmc to 200 tmc . kwdt allocated 177 tmc flood water to karnataka . karnataka will utilze more than allocated 177 tmc . once alammatti height raised on average srisailam won't get any water 1 year out of 3 years. kcr took wrong decision by taking up palamuru rangareddy. if he takeup projects based on godavari (pranahita - chevella) to serve rangareddy then there wont be water fights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, ravindras said: once kwdt gives judgement , projects based on nagarjunasagar & srisailam will be controlled by krmb(center) with cisf/crpf protection. krmb release water according to kwdt allocation. i agree that first we need to get water from karnataka to srisailam . once almatti raised its storage capaicity increase from 123 tmc to 200 tmc . kwdt allocated 177 tmc flood water to karnataka . karnataka will utilze more than allocated 177 tmc . once alammatti height raised on average srisailam won't get any water 1 year out of 3 years. kcr took wrong decision by taking up palamuru rangareddy. if he takeup projects based on godavari (pranahita - chevella) to serve rangareddy then there wont be water fights. but kwdt award vachina, telangana vallu adigaru tungabadhra protocol ni implement cheyamani, plus project wise allocation cheyamani. so first KWDT cheppali wether they allocate water based on project/region ani. palamuru rangareddy kooda carryover water tone kaduthunanru kada? a lekka prakaram mana GNSS, HNSS, veligonda unnayi a head of palamuru so we are on safe side on that context. plus flood waters meeda manake full rights vasthayi, so adi okkate hope. adi every 10 years ki okasari useful ayiddi. at the same time tg kooda through kaleswaram they are diverting 20 tmc ani monna eenadu lo vesadu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnnaGaru Posted March 12, 2019 Author Share Posted March 12, 2019 @ravindras meeru chala sarlu close ga observe chestunna...projects vishayam lo CBN edi chesina tappu(leda negative) ani ayana kastam ni kuda negative lo chupistunaru YSRCP emi chesina(even YSRCP is constructing BOTH kaleswaram&palamuru-rangareddy) aha tappu ledu ane prayatnam chestunaru..... can you imagine CBN&TDP SEEMA MLA(&party 2nd head) doing those same TWO projects and keeping quite without fight against KCR? If so then better give up and let's be slaves to TRS... Also couple of times your posts are shared in twitter & other db's that are against AP&TDP....Once I even posted(and later deleted making sure your read) a thread with one of your posts going around...ALso many times you are adding points against AP ONLY... see below....coming to Godavari-penna - AS POLVARAM treaty, AP has every right to take water to ANY CORNER of AP(not just Prakasam barrage) even to Sagar right canals - Also Telangana argued&submitted that as long as water is not merged into KRISHNA river then it is not counted as USAGE...means any water not merged at prakasam barrage is not counted... AP&CBN is trying to go on same point and you are raising negative points ONLY on AP - That is the reason CBN started&almost completed ELURU canal diversion direct from Polavaram wihout merging in Krishna - ALSO AP is not going to merge NSP right water to Kirshna river(using aqueduct) - Also CBN serverning chintalapudi wihout krisha merge&even planning to serve Tiruvuru also wihout merge in future - Even Krishna district has plans to serve withut merge - Also T will loose more than AP for diverting Godavari 100+ TMC to krishna basin canals..T submitted arguments that they using wihout MERGE.... Godavari Tribunal: (1) Parties have agreed that each of the States concerned will be at liberty to divert any part of the share of the Godavari waters which may be allocated to it by the Godavari Tribunal from the Godavari basin to any other basin. Effect: Andhra Pradesh is free to divert its share of Godavari waters to any other basin including Krishna basis, but cannot be compelled to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Bollu said: but kwdt award vachina, telangana vallu adigaru tungabadhra protocol ni implement cheyamani, plus project wise allocation cheyamani. so first KWDT cheppali wether they allocate water based on project/region ani. palamuru rangareddy kooda carryover water tone kaduthunanru kada? a lekka prakaram mana GNSS, HNSS, veligonda unnayi a head of palamuru so we are on safe side on that context. plus flood waters meeda manake full rights vasthayi, so adi okkate hope. adi every 10 years ki okasari useful ayiddi. at the same time tg kooda through kaleswaram they are diverting 20 tmc ani monna eenadu lo vesadu. kwdt allocated water to karnataka, maharashtra , combined ap blockwise not projectwise . ap arguing that same rule should apply between ap & tg , ie blockwise allocation. mostly kwdt will allocate blockwise ap plan is to utilize krishna water to seema, godavari water to coastal tg plan is to utilize krishna water to south telangana , godavari water to north telangana including khammam & nalgonda. if ap get more share in krishna water it will be good for seema Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 @AnnaGaru can you post twitter links here, other db posts . else you can pm me. i just follow this db. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, ravindras said: kwdt allocated water to karnataka, maharashtra , combined ap blockwise not projectwise . ap arguing that same rule should apply between ap & tg , ie blockwise allocation. mostly kwdt will allocate blockwise ap plan is to utilize krishna water to seema, godavari water to coastal tg plan is to utilize krishna water to south telangana , godavari water to north telangana including khammam & nalgonda. if ap get more share in krishna water it will be good for seema and kwdt neeku palamuru rangareddy ki assured water ketayinchiddi anukuntunnava? never ever KWDT does that. block wise allocate chesinappudu vallu srisalam ni vadukunte kinda sagar left canl situvation emiti. TG vallu seetharama dwara left canal ki etthi posthunnaru like our chinthalapudi, so TG will also loose the share. plus kaleswaram dwara vallu palamur ki divert chesthunnaru. so baga complexity ga undi. plus inka wither godavari/krishna flood water AP enthina vadukovachhu ane daniki meaning emi untadi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 @AnnaGaru my sole intention is ap shouldn't loose any water share before kwdt. godavri-penna 1st phase link happened through krishna river(water merged at prakasam barrage) noth through acqueduct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Bollu said: and kwdt neeku palamuru rangareddy ki assured water ketayinchiddi anukuntunnava? never ever KWDT does that. block wise allocate chesinappudu vallu srisalam ni vadukunte kinda sagar left canl situvation emiti. TG vallu seetharama dwara left canal ki etthi posthunnaru like our chinthalapudi, so TG will also loose the share. plus kaleswaram dwara vallu palamur ki divert chesthunnaru. so baga complexity ga undi. plus inka wither godavari/krishna flood water AP enthina vadukovachhu ane daniki meaning emi untadi. they will use godavari water for sagar left canal but they start construction work only afer getting kwdt judgement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 Just now, ravindras said: they will use godavari water for sagar left canal but they start construction work only afer getting kwdt judgement it doesn't matter kada, mana arguements already aipoyayi. ippudu TG cross examination jaruguthundi and it will take 2 years easily. appudina raise chestharu. mana vallu clear ga water ni just for irrigation and industrial purpose ani GO kooda specific ga icharu more over mana project live lo vachhe daka they can't deduct our water. first GWDT manaki more assured water ni allocate cheyali manaki krishna lo water share ni tagginchali ante, lekapothe godavari flood rakapothe mana situvation emiti. plus mana project kooda 2 years pattiddi complete avvataniki, inka avasaram aithe we can go ahead to SC and get stay on KWDT award, easily we can consume 10 years. elopu vallu kadatahru kda SC lo final arguements jarutahyi. KWDT is not the final verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 6 minutes ago, ravindras said: @AnnaGaru my sole intention is ap shouldn't loose any water share before kwdt. godavri-penna 1st phase link happened through krishna river(water merged at prakasam barrage) noth through acqueduct first telemtery ledu akkada, so manam chepthene intha water vachindi ani they will count. and AP govt GO lo specifically said that we are using that water for drinking and industrial ani, a lekka aithe TG kooda hyderabad ki drinking water testhundi from godavari vallau avi vadukoni singore lo 28 tmc store chesi krishna basin lone vaduthunnaru, denni kooda count cheyalsi vastadi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.