tejaatp Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Donald J. Trump 1 hr · My Administration will follow two simple rules: BUY AMERICAN and HIRE AMERICAN! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRUDHVI Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Superb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Superb Paradesi Prudvi padha ika manam mana swadesam ellifodhaam... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Do replace & read the words - ' Donald J Trump' & 'American' with ' Narendra D Modi' & ' Indian' or ' Vladimir Putin' & 'Russian' or ' Benjamin Netenyahu' & ' Israeli' and visualize, speaking to their respective people; Won't sound as offensive as, we are cultivated to ...It is all in our thinking, perspective..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anne Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Ee us lo mostly ppl antha mixed breed ga ... who is american. ??☺ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tejaatp Posted December 14, 2016 Author Share Posted December 14, 2016 Ee us lo mostly ppl antha mixed breed ga ... who is american. ??☺ almost all western countries antha valasa pakshule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 What is American ?.....In a bottomline, mundane practical world, it is by the dimension of - ' Legal/Illegal ' basis... In a philosophical sense, Americans, by book & in spirit also in large extent, not like to go by blood & looks, rather by a common melting cultural thread, dating back to atleast 2 to 3 centuries to current times.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nfdbno1 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 What is American ?.....In a bottomline, mundane practical world, it is by the dimension of - ' Legal/Illegal ' basis... In a philosophical sense, Americans, by book & in spirit also in large extent, not like to go by blood & looks, rather by a common melting cultural thread, dating back to atleast 2 to 3 centuries to current times.... Do replace & read the words - ' Donald J Trump' & 'American' with ' Narendra D Modi' & ' Indian' or ' Vladimir Putin' & 'Russian' or ' Benjamin Netenyahu' & ' Israeli' and visualize, speaking to their respective people; Won't sound as offensive as, we are cultivated to ...It is all in our thinking, perspective..... until things fall in place! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VisionaryCBN Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Fake tweet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tejaatp Posted December 14, 2016 Author Share Posted December 14, 2016 Fake tweet official fb page lo undi brother just cross check once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VisionaryCBN Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 official fb page lo undi brother just cross check onceMy bad..I thought it's a tweet..didn't find in twitter so thought fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VisionaryCBN Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Buy American failed earlier...it will fail again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Listen bros...... Corrupting Tweets & statements, has been the calling card for liberals & loony left, the operating system, as pointed many times, and decoding their language, for the last few months here.......In 'liberal' mindset, seeking Truth is not considered virtue, 'attending to emotions' takes that place, So, any means possible to advance the 'just cause', a fair game in their perspective... The forged tweet may be designed for mischievous purpose, but message is not too deviant from, what Trump has been communicating to his audience,all along, regarding lost factories across america and the corresponding jobs, reason he won..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRUDHVI Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Paradesi Prudvi padha ika manam mana swadesam ellifodhaam...annay Modi Make in India antey thighs slap chesina idhe fans y now shoulder rubbings evadi country vaadiki great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nfdbno1 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 annay Modi Make in India antey thighs slap chesina idhe fans y now shoulder rubbings evadi country vaadiki great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinayak Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 annay Modi Make in India antey thighs slap chesina idhe fans y now shoulder rubbings evadi country vaadiki great Idi evari country Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRUDHVI Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Idi evari country manadesam evari country mandhena annay inthaki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRUDHVI Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 America is made of immigrant is so stereotypical arguments move on guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOND.. Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 what's wrong? He is president elect of USA. Not prime minister of India. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Going to unwrap here, something different, away from the accepted ' vulnerable liberal wisdom' ....What is it ?.....Generally in liberal mindsets, one has to appeal & appease to the weak spots to attract, focusing on the emotional vulnerabilities of other people ...... Well, it works with people, especially with ' insecurities '......Also in liberal domain, being strong is danger, and strong characters will always fight....... No, being strong does not necessarily mean, imminent fights between strong characters.....In case of Trump, Putin, Modi, Netenyahu etc- their strong characters will bring something else to the table, a binding factor, all four will have healthy & deep respect for each other because of their 'Self Secure' ways.... Strong people connect different than vulnerable & needy people, when they do, it is always going to be big & profound... .. You watch ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swarnandhra Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 almost all western countries antha valasa pakshule not true. European countries are not that ethinically diverse despite of immigrant flood in the last couple of decades in to Germany/France/England. Scandinavian countries in particular population is still homegenious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 annay Modi Make in India antey thighs slap chesina idhe fans y now shoulder rubbings evadi country vaadiki great I agree Frudhvi...I am on the same page with Trump on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PP SIMHA Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Paradesi Prudvi padha ika manam mana swadesam ellifodhaam... yes i also support u annai ... lets go home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PP SIMHA Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 I agree Frudhvi...I am on the same page with Trump on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 yes i also support u annai ... lets go home. nuvvante CRDA llo oka moola ninchi bhooakramana sesifaaranokkaav...nenu inthavaraku emi sampadhinchaledhu kadhe ..mana CBN govt llo job set seyyave ellifodhaam.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramarajyam Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Ntng wrong in trump statement even though it hurt us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Many Indian professionals succeeded in America, not because of loop holes in its system, but for their talents & capability in market ; Yes ofcourse, most countries will have laws first and foremost designed for its constituents, as first priority, so do US,nothing unfair there........Every land in almost all cases, will incorporate some advantage to its people, when compared to non-citizens while competing for jobs; Its not abnormal...... To say or presume or expect that, Indian professionals need some sort of 'even field' in a foreign land, away from natives of their 'homecourt' advantage, to compete, is missing the mark.....Confident & savvy Indian professionals will always excel, and make themselves needed in the market, even playing on 'road' ; For those special breed of people, meeting legal requirements of competing foreign land, will not be a big deal ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Npower Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Finally, Hitler is great. Historians spoiled his image... but he is the real inspiration for today's politicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Npower Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW You are here How Hitler Tackled UnemploymentAnd Revived Germany’s EconomyBy Mark Weber To deal with the massive unemployment and economic paralysis of the Great Depression, both the US and German governments launched innovative and ambitious programs. Although President Franklin Roosevelt’s “New Deal” measures helped only marginally, the Third Reich’s much more focused and comprehensive policies proved remarkably effective. Within three years unemployment was banished and Germany’s economy was flourishing. And while Roosevelt’s record in dealing with the Depression is pretty well known, the remarkable story of how Hitler tackled the crisis is not widely understood or appreciated. Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany on January 30, 1933. A few weeks later, on March 4, Franklin Roosevelt took office as President of the United States. Each man remained his country’s chief executive for the next twelve years -- until April 1945, shortly before the end of World War II in Europe. In early 1933 industrial production in each country had fallen to about half of what it had been in 1929. Each leader quickly launched bold new initiatives to tackle the terrible economic crisis, above all the scourge of mass unemployment. And although there are some striking similarities between the efforts of the two governments, the results were very different. One of the most influential and widely read American economists of the twentieth century was John Kenneth Galbraith. He was an advisor to several presidents, and for a time served as US ambassador to India. He was the author of several dozen books, and for years taught economics at Harvard University. With regard to Germany’s record, Galbraith wrote: “… The elimination of unemployment in Germany during the Great Depression without inflation -- and with initial reliance on essential civilian activities -- was a signal accomplishment. It has rarely been praised and not much remarked. The notion that Hitler could do no good extends to his economics as it does, more plausibly, to all else.” The Hitler regime’s economic policy, Galbraith goes on, involved “large scale borrowing for public expenditures, and at first this was principally for civilian work -- railroads, canals and the Autobahnen [highway network]. The result was a far more effective attack on unemployment than in any other industrial country.” / 1 “By late 1935,” he also wrote, “unemployment was at an end in Germany. By 1936 high income was pulling up prices or making it possible to raise them … Germany, by the late thirties, had full employment at stable prices. It was, in the industrial world, an absolutely unique achievement.” / 2 “Hitler also anticipated modern economic policy,” the economist noted, “by recognizing that a rapid approach to full employment was only possible if it was combined with wage and price controls. That a nation oppressed by economic fears would respond to Hitler as Americans did to F.D.R. is not surprising.” / 3 Other countries, Galbraith wrote, failed to understand or to learn from the German experience: “The German example was instructive but not persuasive. British and American conservatives looked at the Nazi financial heresies -- the borrowing and spending -- and uniformly predicted a breakdown … And American liberals and British socialists looked at the repression, the destruction of the unions, the Brownshirts, the Blackshirts, the concentration camps, and screaming oratory, and ignored the economics. Nothing good [they believed], not even full employment, could come from Hitler.” / 4 Two days after taking office as Chancellor, Hitler addressed the nation by radio. Although he and other leaders of his movement had made clear their intention to reorganize the nation’s social, political, cultural and educational life in accord with National Socialist principles, everyone knew that, with some six million jobless and the national economy in paralysis, the great priority of the moment was to restore the nation’s economic life, above all by tackling unemployment and providing productive work. “The misery of our people is horrible to behold!,” said Hitler in this inaugural address. / 5 “Along with the hungry unemployed millions of industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization …” The new government, Hitler said, would “achieve the great task of reorganizing our nation’s economy by means of two great four-year plans. The German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation’s food supply and, in consequence, the nation’s vital foundation. The German worker will be saved from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment.” “Within four years,” he pledged, “unemployment must be decisively overcome … The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four years and then pass judgment upon us!” Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National Socialist, Hitler appointed him President of Germany’s central bank, the Reichsbank, and then as Minister of Economics. After taking power, writes Prof. John Garraty, a prominent American historian, Hitler and his new government “immediately launched an all-out assault on unemployment … They stimulated private industry through subsidies and tax rebates, encouraged consumer spending by such means as marriage loans, and plunged into the massive public-works program that produced the autobahn [highway system], and housing, railroad and navigation projects.” / 6 EXCELLENT ARTICLE ON HITLER TACKLING UNEMPLOYMENT PROBLEM IN GERMANY.... MUST READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Npower Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Appudu koodaa... LEFTIES & LIBERALS...YE VILLAINS.... chi... veellaku siggu raademo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.