Jump to content

US elections


Kiran

Recommended Posts

 

 

visa lu raavatam varaku OK...

 

Republicans teesukune decisions chaala varaku bankruptacies ki daari teestai and recession vastadi...visa raaka india lo korchotam veru...jobs leka US lo koorchotam veru...2nd one is more terrible than prior....

 

if you notice for the past 5 or 6 months, chaala mandiki visa's vatchai...before that antha ledu kaani...

 

manaki ee country entha avasaramo vaallaki manam anthe avasaram...oorike vadulu koru...

 

but obama is using indian resources in a controlled fashion...which is kind of good...

Atleast masters chesina vallane vadelese... India nunde company visa meedha vachevallani ranivva kunda unte chalu.. Valla vallaa Sagam market lo rates ravatam ledhu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 309
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Adhey naa bhayam kooda....ee romney gaadu malla recession thesthaademo ani

 

obviously...the way he announced 5 principles in creating jobs is by elevating middle class and low-tire industries and self employed industries...for this where he gonna get the funds?? bank loans, low taxes...this would lead to low treasure which violates the traditional threshold cash flow balance...this would obviously lead to bankruptcies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

visa lu raavatam varaku OK...

 

Republicans teesukune decisions chaala varaku bankruptacies ki daari teestai and recession vastadi...visa raaka india lo korchotam veru...jobs leka US lo koorchotam veru...2nd one is more terrible than prior....

 

if you notice for the past 5 or 6 months, chaala mandiki visa's vatchai...before that antha ledu kaani...

 

manaki ee country entha avasaramo vaallaki manam anthe avasaram...oorike vadulu koru...

 

but obama is using indian resources in a controlled fashion...which is kind of good...

Yevari kastalu varivii.. There is no denying in that :shakehands: .

5 or 6 months vasthunayee .. just like a BISCUIT elections mundhu...

yedhi yemainaa.. INDIA ki vorigedhi yemi ledhu.. Valla ki yendhi best ayethe adhe jaruguthundhi at the end :shakehands:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atleast masters chesina vallane vadelese... India nunde company visa meedha vachevallani ranivva kunda unte chalu.. Valla vallaa Sagam market lo rates ravatam ledhu

Anteee... fake lu petakundaa.. okalaki okalu dubbing lu chepuko kunda vuntee... INDIA nunchi yendhuku tepichukuntaru baa... :shakehands:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atleast masters chesina vallane vadelese... India nunde company visa meedha vachevallani ranivva kunda unte chalu.. Valla vallaa Sagam market lo rates ravatam ledhu

 

evadi baadha vaadidi....old dwags dont want new dwags in their domains ani natural theory ni follow avuthunnaava babai...brahmi.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Atleast masters chesina vallane vadelese... India nunde company visa meedha vachevallani ranivva kunda unte chalu.. Valla vallaa Sagam market lo rates ravatam ledhu

Yevari kastalu varivii.. There is no denying in that :shakehands: .

5 or 6 months nasthunayee .. just like a BISCUIT elections mundhu...

yedhi yemainaa.. INDIA ki vorigedhi yemi ledhu.. Valla ki yendhi best ayethe adhe jaruguthundhi at the end :shakehands:

 

I agree a part of it...India nunchi vatche vaallu companies ki laabam tetchipedataru tapithe vaallaki pedda labam ledu and ikkada vunna vaallaki pedda bokka...this should be controlled... I believe there are already enough Indian resources in US right now...

 

@baktha... biscuit e aina kooda that mean a lot to most of us...ennalla nuncho wait chestunna vaallu antha ee 5 or 6 months lo safe ayyaru...konni vela mandi canada or india nunchi visa lu tetchukunnaru...and India ki origedi enti ante, [1] Billion dollars of TAXED money is transfrred to India every year...idantha mana kashtame.... [2] India lo kontha competetion tagguddi for skilled jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anteee... fake lu petakundaa.. okalaki okalu dubbing lu chepuko kunda vuntee... INDIA nunchi yendhuku tepichukuntaru baa... :shakehands:

ave pettina.. Job join auyyaka 75% people bagane work chestharu... And moreover India nunde company H1 meedha vachi.. Ekkada H1 meedha vallu edeche edupulu mamuluga undav... Makante thakkuva exp undhe ekkuva sampadisthunav... Ettane yedupulu Chala unnaye.. Chala mandi company h1 meedha vachi .. Enduku h1 ni vere company ki marchukune.. Enduku ekkade untunaruu antav...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anteee... fake lu petakundaa.. okalaki okalu dubbing lu chepuko kunda vuntee... INDIA nunchi yendhuku tepichukuntaru baa... :shakehands:

 

Do you really think SO? Skills kosam outsource chestnnaru anukunte mana moorkatvame brother...It is cheapest way to get things done...

 

FYI....Oka rakanga ippudu minimum 6+ years adugutunnaru ante daaniki india nunchi vatche vaalle sagam kaaranam...akkadidi ikkadidi kalipi 3+ pedatharu...MS chesina vaallu 4+ antaaru...malli veellu 6 antaaru...ila manam penchukunnade....

 

ee roju nuvvu annattu dubbing aina, skype interviews aina manam chesukunnade...swayam kruthaaparaadam....

 

do you really think that most of the jobs we guys are doing really needs 6+ experience?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to economy, Obama is clueless, Romney confused pdf_button.png printButton.png emailButton.png

Tuesday, 16 October 2012 17:48

Neither Obama nor Romney realise that government intervention as it is practiced in the US is not the answer to deliver people out of poverty.

 

In 2009 when Obama assumed office a troy ounce of gold cost $850. Forty odd months later, it costs approximately $1700. Likewise, a gallon of gas (petrol) in US cost $1.85. Today it has doubled to about $3.70.

Political analysts do not realise that this doubling of these commodity prices signifies an implicit depreciation of US dollar in the past three years.

Yet, this depreciation has not made the US economy competitive. It continues to run gargantuan trade deficits, notably with China. Simultaneously under Obama, the US economy ran budget deficits too, in excess of $1 trillion every year, for the past four years.

The net impact - US national debt in 2008 which was less than $10 trillions, now exceeds a staggering $16 trillions. Interestingly, it is pointed out that the debt contacted during the first three years of Obama's presidency exceeds the combined debt of all Presidents beginning George Washington till Clinton took office!

As a consequence, the Debt-GDP ratio in US has crossed 106 per cent even as I write this. All these prompted the Standard & Poor to downgrade the US debt rating from AAA last August.

Despite contacting such massive debts [in excess of $6 trillions] during these three years, the GDP of US under Obama's presidency has risen barely by a trillion dollars - from $15 to $16 trillions. That implies that a dollar rise in nation income necessitates a six dollar increase in national debt - a fact that is lost on most economists.

Consequently, despite all the hoopla surrounding the US economy under Obama administration, the number of unemployed has been consistently in excess of 7.8 per cent while real median household income decreased - yes decreased - by $4,000. Meanwhile, the number of people dependent on food stamps increased from 32 million to 47 millions.

With soaring unemployment, half of Americans are carrying forward their credit card dues aggregating to nearly $800 billion paying interest rates in excess of 13 percent per annum. As a direct result of all this, the household debt to income ratio exceeds 160 per cent - which in turn implies bankrupt citizenry besides a near bankrupt government.

Further, a staggering 48.5 per cent of all Americans live in a household that receives some form of government benefits. Back in 1983, that number was below 30 per cent.

Finally the killer punch: according to The New York Times, approximately 100 million Americans are either living in poverty or in "the fretful zone just above it."

Tweedledum and Tweedledee

Thanks to the Internet, all these information on US economy and much more are readily available.

For over a decade now some economists have been consistently warning that the American economic model is well and truly unsustainable even for the US. Worryingly, the US government and mainstream economists have been in a state of denial and hence unable to conjure appropriate remedial measures. Are the laws of economics finally catching with the US? Probably yes.

One may recall that it was just a few years ago, in the fall of 2008 to be precise, that most pundits across the globe approved every bit of Obama's movement, applauded every single utterance and appreciated every single idea of his. It would seem that he could do no wrong.

Strangely the man, without telling clearly what he intended to do, mesmerised the voters with his slogan "yes we can." The soft under belly of competitive electoral politics, even in a matured democracy like US was clearly visible when Obama could exploit the latent fears [in the back drop of the 2008 US financial crisis] of the electorate blatantly.

An electorate already reeling from the effects of the US financial crisis, voted for a Tweedledum, who was suave, smoother and smarter than Tweedledee. In the process, the bankruptcy in the US thinking to tackle their economic crisis was exposed like never before.

Way back in November 2008, just days after his election in a column titled "The economic challenges before Obama" I had commented on how his promises to fix the US economy was "akin to promises made by our politicians during election time: with a crucial difference, of course: it is constructed with absolute care, sugar-coated with clinical precision and delivered with absolute finesse so as to escape any sort of critical examination."

Pointing put to the fact that several lobbies and vested interest had effectively taken over the US economy, in conclusion, I observed that Obama had a clear choice - "to eliminate all these cartels and lobbies and be a genuine ambassador for change."

In the alternative, I had suggested, he could tinker with the US economy "like the makers of the Ambassador car in India in the seventies who tinkered with the tail-lamps and dashboards to bring about newer models." "At this point," I had predicted then, "he seems to be going the Ambassador car way."

Four years later I stand vindicated.

Lest readers believe that I am needlessly needling Obama, I must hasten to add that McCain, the presidential nominee of the Republican Party in 2008 too did not proffer any great solutions either. Put differently, if Americans had elected McCain instead of Obama, would it have made any significant difference to the US economy today? I guess not.

Not an economic crisis, but crisis of economics

The Democratic Party under Clinton worked hard for China's access into the WTO. The Republicans under Bush carried the agenda to a logical conclusion and in 2001 China became a member of the WTO.

As Republicans accuse Democrats and vice-versa, economists point out that US lost 50,000 manufacturing jobs on an average every month ever since China joined WTO. And in a remarkable co-incidence more than 56,000 manufacturing facilities in US have also been shut down since 2001.

Yet Romney promises 12 million new jobs in his debate with Obama last week. Experiences of the past decade in US indicate that this is extremely difficult if not impossible. So what is Romney's game plan?

On this, Romney is delightfully vague [as Obama was four years ago]. As a way forward, he believes lowering taxes would do the trick to revive manufacturing in US, little realising that taxes are a function of profits.

Where is the question of profits [and taxes] when manufacturing facilities are getting closed by the thousands on a yearly basis? Romney misses the obvious.

Alleging that Obama ran an administration for four years on what he calls as a trickle-down-government that allowed for "a bigger government," in the process "spending more, taxing more, regulating more" Romney concedes that the "amount of debt we're adding, at a trillion a year, is simply not moral." Perfect.

But to achieve deficit cuts without raising taxes Romney proposes to cut government expenditure. In a rhetorical flourish he adds "What things would I cut from spending? Well, first of all, I will eliminate all programs by this test, if they don't pass it: Is the program so critical it's worth borrowing money from China to pay for it? And if not, I'll get rid of it."

In short, he proposes to cut expenditures, not raise taxes and yet lower deficits!

Obama's response to controlling deficits is slightly complex. "You know, my grandmother, some of you know, helped to raise me... And she was fiercely independent. And she ended up living alone by choice. And the reason she could be independent was because of Social Security and Medicare. She had worked all her life, put in this money and understood that there was a basic guarantee, a floor under which she could not go" he adds rationalising his policies.

Now if that sounds complicated, Obama labours on and adds "And there are millions of people out there who are counting on this" implying that the US government cannot cut its welfare expenditure because of its poor people. Obviously Obama assumes that his welfare policies, which eventually lead to such extraordinary debts and deficits, are good economics.

"So my approach is to say, how do we strengthen the system over the long term?" Long-term? Well that is a politician's way of saying not my responsibility to clean the mess created by me.

Importantly, Obama and Romney do not realise that US government expenditure as a share of GDP has steadily risen from 17 per cent in 1948 to approximately 42 per cent now. In the interregnum, both the Republicans and Democrats have alternatively been in power and hence collectively guilty of this economic mess.

Both Obama and Romney seem to be oblivious of this fundamental fact. Market economics as it is practiced in US has pushed millions of Americans below poverty line in the first place. Unfortunately, neither do they realise that government intervention as it is practiced in US is not the answer to deliver people out of poverty.

In conclusion, Romney has no concrete game-plan to generate employment. Obama on the other hand has no idea on the debilitating impact of debts and deficits. No wonder, for the American electorate, electing Obama or Romney makes no real difference. One is clueless; the other, confused.

http://www.rediff.com/business/column/column-when-it-comes-to-economy-obama-is-clueless-romney-confused/20121008.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

may be...can be...could be...ikkada maa university ki US Ambassador to India David Mulford vachchaadu....athanu kooda adhe seppaadu...Relations with India was one of the top priorities for Bush Administration ani...brahmi.gif

 

Srk bro....It is next to impossible to do posts on these matters in brevity.....It will take long time to give a small piece due to various factors.....So usually I refrain. Tough to tell a point without chronicling lot of information, cultures, various things, philosophies, values.....synthesizing everything ....

 

Still...I will give you a clue.....Think about a Strong and Self Confident Vaajpaaye......could deliver something worthy without looking over shoulders (even from Pakistan's Perspective)...or Weak kneed MM Singh or someone(not personal level only...even in philosophical way in India). not possible, lot of second guessing, not sure how others react, how the pol. equations going to be etc.....you get the point....Oka pedha pani avvalante..... balamaina vyakthi thone Business cheyyaali.....Balaheenula tho yeppudu avvadhu....manchi ki paniki raaru, chedu ku paniki raaru...Chanakya says similar thing, dont remember exactly...Not that Bush will go out of the way and Jeorpadise US national interests and bat for India's......But it is from that side of pol. spectrum (in US) if they are ready for good alliance with India, not many will second guess.......them.

 

Hope you got what I am trying to say. This kind of things and others, it is laborious and exhausting to explain in forums, because everyone is at different level of understanding, knowledge, awareness......With Speaking, it is easier, even if one has different levels of audience, one can do extemporaneously giving insights in to topics..... :shakehands:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

evadi baadha vaadidi....old dwags dont want new dwags in their domains ani natural theory ni follow avuthunnaava babai...brahmi.gif

 

ofcourse annai...but now it reached to the bottle neck...IT industry already have enough Indian resources now....next 2 years lo MS complete chese vaallu will be surplus...

 

India lo already vunna manchi job vadulukuni 45 to 50 K kosam ikkadiki vastaru...already 60 to 70 K ki chese vaallaki competetion....vaallaki bokka...

 

Do you know?most of the companies like CTS, TCS, infosys enter as a resource supplier, then sub contract the projects and india lo offshore vaalla cheta work cheyistunnaru...what they do is for 5-8 lakh INR, what these companies get is millions of dollars...

 

Of course evari aasal vaalladi..evari prayatnam vaalladi...but...inka chaalu anedi naa feeling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moreover ekkada Memu nana Sankaluu nakii MS complete chestham.. Meeru matram company H1b meedha vachi maa meedha yedavatam.. Mundu ADe apithe bagunduu :pray:

 

monna okadu makubexp undi ..nuku ledu annadu.. naku masters undi nikundaa ani adigaa.. company director tho kurchoni 1-1 matladataniki niku dairyam ledhu .. naku undi ..state client governor office thi director thone matadathuna...

 

more over nikanna takkuva exp unna ekkuva knowledge undi.. performance issues lo naku skip kottav ... so learning anthu ledhu .. exp doesnt count all the time.. common sense counts anaa.. moham m lee petti pakaki thenkesadu ..

 

ma communication baguntadi ani antaru h1 b valu .. m tho navalo m ethi navaloo ardam kadu.. lol..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ave pettina.. Job join auyyaka 75% people bagane work chestharu... And moreover India nunde company H1 meedha vachi.. Ekkada H1 meedha vallu edeche edupulu mamuluga undav... Makante thakkuva exp undhe ekkuva sampadisthunav... Ettane yedupulu Chala unnaye.. Chala mandi company h1 meedha vachi .. Enduku h1 ni vere company ki marchukune.. Enduku ekkade untunaruu antav...

Do you really think SO? Skills kosam outsource chestnnaru anukunte mana moorkatvame brother...It is cheapest way to get things done...

 

FYI....Oka rakanga ippudu minimum 6+ years adugutunnaru ante daaniki india nunchi vatche vaalle sagam kaaranam...akkadidi ikkadidi kalipi 3+ pedatharu...MS chesina vaallu 4+ antaaru...malli veellu 6 antaaru...ila manam penchukunnade....

 

ee roju nuvvu annattu dubbing aina, skype interviews aina manam chesukunnade...swayam kruthaaparaadam....

 

do you really think that most of the jobs we guys are doing really needs 6+ experience?

Ayooo don't take that as personal .... US loo jobs kote mana desi galu andharu ala ne chesthunaru ani kadhu... And US ki H1 medha vachina vallu andharu YEDUSTHARU ani kadhuu.. there two sides for every coin ane naa udesamm... mana valla vallu labapadthunaruu.. vaalla valla manamu labaha padamu antee. :shakehands: And this is a wild wild world brother ,there is always a race & the fittest will survive anthe.. :shakehands:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Srk bro....It is next to impossible to do posts on these matters in brevity.....It will take long time to give a small piece due to various factors.....So usually I refrain. Tough to tell a point without chronicling lot of information, cultures, various things, philosophies, values.....synthesizing everything ....

 

Still...I will give you a clue.....Think about a Strong and Self Confident Vaajpaaye......could deliver something worthy without looking over shoulders (even from Pakistan's Perspective)...or Weak kneed MM Singh or someone(not personal level only...even in philosophical way in India). not possible, lot of second guessing, not sure how others react, how the pol. equations going to be etc.....you get the point....Oka pedha pani avvalante..... balamaina vyakthi thone Business cheyyaali.....Balaheenula tho yeppudu avvadhu....manchi ki paniki raaru, chedu ku paniki raaru...Chanakya says similar thing, dont remember exactly...Not that Bush will go out of the way and Jeorpadise US national interests and bat for India's......But it is from that side of pol. spectrum (in US) if they are ready for good alliance with India, not many will second guess.......them.

 

Hope you got what I am trying to say. This kind of things and others, it is laborious and exhausting to explain in forums, because everyone is at different level of understanding, knowledge, awareness......With Speaking, it is easier, even if one has different levels of audience, one can do extemporaneously giving insights in to topics..... :shakehands:

 

Thank you vasu brother....ituvanti topics elaborate ga ikkada discuss cheyyali ante kastame...but I think you conveyed the point....Whoever is the American President, they always deal with other countries from the standpoint of keeping American Interests in Mind..not for favouring other countries...naa viewpoint aiythe idhe...meeru adhe chepparu anukuntunna...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...