Sr Fan Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 BROILER KODI andham gaa vuntadhi.....pure WHITE or even shell WHITE......nicely fattened......Orderly( to the master) ...unnachOtE vuntaayi, yekkadiki poYE prasakthi ledhu.....disciplined gaa chEsthaa vuntaayi panulu..... FREE RANGE KODI....... antha WHITE gaa vundaalsina pani ledhu..... machalu, shades vuntaayi, kaani Organic gaa....nothing designed from outside.......by its name thana thindi thanu vethukkuntadhi.......fast gaa vuntadhi.......knows how to survive and uses good air and natural food......Not fed.... Broiler chicken ki aa paina alanti attributes vunna....chuudataaniki .......thana kaaLLa meedha thanu nilabada ledhu........Free Range chk. ki legs balam gaa vuntaayi, by its nature.... below is a column by Brahma Chellaney, Geostrategist and Author ....... India vaallu.......arupulu, kekalu kaani panulu assalu sunna.......piriki vaadi kOpam....... --------------------------------------------------------------------- After the U.S. indictment and de facto expulsion of the New York-based Indian woman diplomat who was arrested and strip searched, it is important to remember that India’s only tangible response to the entire episode has been to withdraw some unilateral privileges to U.S. diplomats and consular officials that it shouldn’t have extended in the first place. America’s demeaning strip and cavity search of an Indian diplomat in breach of international norms has become a symbol of a once-flourishing bilateral relationship gone awry. The U.S. and India entered into a much-ballyhooed strategic partnership, not a patron-client relationship. With 27 military allies, the U.S., however, is used to a patron-client equation, not a partnership, which demands some degree of equivalence and mutual respect. It thus began to take India for granted, and appeared genuinely surprised that India reacted to Devyani Khobragade’s humiliation as if it were the proverbial straw threatening to break its back. U.S.’s “problem” with India extends well beyond this episode. For example, almost one-third of all T visas it has issued worldwide to victims of extremely grave sex or labour trafficking have been to Indians, thus mocking the most-populous democracy’s judicial system. The manner in which it spirited out of India the family of Khobragade’s maid on T visas and with tax-exempt tickets improperly procured by its embassy, paradoxically, was tantamount to an act of state-sponsored trafficking. The action had an openly conspiratorial ring to it: No sooner had the U.S., playing global cop, “evacuated” the maid’s family from its home country than it arrested Khobragade. Make no mistake: America would not have dared to arrest and strip search a Chinese or Russian diplomat for allegedly underpaying a maid because that would have invited swift and disproportionate retaliation. In fact, just one week before Khobragade’s arrest, Preetinder Singh Bharara—the rogue prosecutor in New York who likes to be addressed as “Preet” or “Pete” when in reality he is Mr. Pretender—charged a number of Russian diplomats and consular officials for defrauding Medicaid of $1.5 million. But before unveiling the charges, the defendants were allowed to leave the US. What has been India’s response to the insults heaped on it, or what the incredible Manmohan Singh called “some hiccups”? Don’t let all the sound and fury spook you: India’s only response thus far has been to start withdrawing non-reciprocal privileges to US diplomatic and consular staff and their families. In a classic case of impotent fury, India made no effort to try to penalize the U.S. Indeed, India did the exact opposite by rewarding America with a new mega-contract—a $1.01-billion deal for additional C-130J military aircraft. Its demand for a formal apology has dissipated. It did not even hold back its new ambassador from taking charge in Washington until the U.S. made some amends. Why blame the U.S. for taking liberties when India’s toadying foreign minister has hailed NSA’s notorious global surveillance as “only a computer study” and “not snooping”? Indeed, no Indian is asking the key question: Why did India in the first place unilaterally extend the privileges to U.S. diplomatic and consular staff that it is now withdrawing? India’s servility went to the extent of granting family members of U.S. consular officials a degree of diplomatic immunity for which they were ineligible. Ignoring its own security protocol, India handed out identity-less airport passes usable by any diplomat or consular official. India’s VVIPs, often seeking visas and other favours for their relatives, blocked New Delhi’s Nyaya Marg (the road behind the U.S. Embassy) to graciously allow U.S. Embassy personnel to visit the American Club without having to cross a public street. New Delhi made no effort over the years to ensure that those working in American schools and other non-diplomatic U.S. government facilities in India were employed in compliance with Indian labour laws, which mandate, among other things, income tax and provident fund deductions. U.S. diplomats’ spouses worked in American schools and other U.S. facilities without seeking host-nation permission or paying taxes on their earnings. India turned a blind eye to such violations, which, if they occurred in the U.S., would land a violator in serious trouble, possibly even in jail. India has now asked a reluctant U.S. Embassy to supply all the relevant details. Will the Embassy come clean? Who will crack the enforcement whip? India’s compromised governing elites? There is yet another unanswered question: When there was a non-bailable Indian warrant against Khobragade’s absconding maid, how did Indian immigration allow her family to leave on “T” visas? True, a family cannot be liable for an absconding member. Yet Indian immigration and intelligence should have smelt a rat that the family was leaving on “trafficking” visas. Clearly, Indian authorities have a lot to answer for. India—having absorbed no lesson from the case involving U.S. informant David Headley—must blame itself for inviting the latest outrage. Indeed, what was billed as India’s atypically tough response has ended in a whimper, reinforcing the country’s lamb-like image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naga Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Chaala nerchukovachu bro mee nundi and CHSRK bro nundi... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 Why it is NOT equal relationship? mee thO paatu college ki vellina mee friend, happened to be minister's son, wealthier than you in material properties.......Given both want mingling together........It can happen in two ways......Patronizing or Genuine Friendship.......This depends on the 'leverage' you give.....Relationship by its nature is built by two people.....If nobody wants relationship, no problem.....If both pursue relationship, you have to be crystal clear about your VALUES.... It is NOT that you dont have a CHOICE...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 Courtesy some one, who is angst about the disparity of the relationship illustrates his point this way.... 'When the US tows away a Russian diplomat’ car in Washington for a parking violation, six US diplomatic cars disappear in Moscow. The Russian car then magically appears with apology. That is the type of diplomacy we need.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raaz@NBK Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntr_paritala Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 India is a weak nation internally.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravana Brahma Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 India is a weak nation internally.. Indian Politicians are weak. How many of them have the guts to talk about Reservations, Debt, Income inequality. All they do is subsidise everything and provide everything for free (like Electricity, Food, Money etc.) There by Making Indians as Broiler Chickens mentality as mentioned in the first post, when indeed we were a generation ago had a true Free range mentality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 R Brahma bro.... the economic dimension of dependability is worth( talking internally) debating, but the Overarching point of that post is not focused on that factor......It is the Relationship with respect to US... It is getting in to a relationship .... trying to buy the arms etc. in the way suits only one party - ikkada brief gaa cheppatam kastam....but the structure of those deals generally, US tailors according to Unilateral advantages- machuki.....knowledge Transfer vundadhu......even for maintenance ki.....inka chaala vuntaayi.....Deals kuuda competitive nature thO kaakunda, dhaadhaapu nobidding level lo..why Ind. need to do that.....totally advantage for one side....India sontha dabbula thO konukkuntadhi, unlike other countries who purchase from US.....Ind. does not need to, chaala mandhi vendors kuuda vunnaaru......why giving that much business with not much advantage.. infact dependency laagaa.. See India ......come 2 or 3 decades later....not going to be some Australia 2 or UK 3 kaadhu...........Distinct Culture(dilute ayindhi...still roots lo) .....Way of life is different.....the way it sees World is different than an Unidimensional( money...goodies....single scale for the Society outlook) western hemisphere culture .....When the prosperity comes, more probability that India connecting to its roots....then it will project its Value System( not by force...that is not the DNA)... Simply India is not going to be something llke an Australian version in culture and all others things following the leaders(US or sometime ago UK) in that Cultural Outlook......alaaga... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntr_paritala Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 See this video bro India was stronger in 1950s compared to now http://youtu.be/7ylzRZA5-zs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 thappakunda bro...... ohh definitely......India was better placed in 50's... simple logic.....pachadi annam thinu, pride gaa vundu......India's motto was like that ever since Independence......appudu goodies kuuda inka thakkuva... still....aa Thought process....emphasis on that kind of Independent nature gives lot of advantages......Tangible gaa appudE kanapadavu......takes even decades........ eppudu MARS meedha ku India velthundhi( ofcourse US advantage) kaani Australia lu...inka other followers Europe lo vi....kaadhu.... India has to be Fiercely Independent..... Actually this Indian Diplomat case, is a warning sign for them....To pause a moment and take stock of recent hurried 'dates' with US......In a more strategic point of view, the Think Tank got a chance to reevaluate the relationships...... India ki yevarithO bhayam ledhu.....buuchi ni chuupinchi pressure lo panulu kaanivvataaniki......It survived all these years, with even less technology......Dependency ki matuku pOkuudadhu.....It is detrimental Spirit wise in the beginning.....Tangible results follow later.......Matter of Fact, US vaallaki assalu Respect vundadhu( they dont respect Egypts, Pakistan s , Turkey etc at all) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 See this video bro India was stronger in 1950s compared to now http://youtu.be/7ylzRZA5-zs Dont you love this kind of Swagger......Not the Trash Talking style......But firmly understanding and seated with the India's position filled with strong Convictions.........It does not matter the Disparity in Wealth situation at that point with respect to US..... Simple fact.......cliche laaga vuntadhi kaani.....it is true........aatmaabhimaanam lEkapOthE, nobody will respect.......Try being friends, equally respecting your self first...... mana ...so called Intellectuals.....they are in hurry of learning the Western Culture( language, behavior, thinking patterns), they lost the ORIGINALS of India......At the Highest level Idea Receiving ki parimitham ayipOyaaru.....They are NOT becoming donors, because they are not Connecting to their innate Organic subjects( ideas, culture, thought processes, way of life, all those things).... aa Conviction Strength ....polite gaa english lo maatladuthunna.......It is brimming ....Can see the body language too.... TFS the video bro... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sr Fan Posted January 18, 2014 Author Share Posted January 18, 2014 Only in Western Culture( because of the history) they need to separate their 'Religion' with the Governing........If Religion( the values those go with that word) is that bad, why even practice it in Private Life......This is where lot of DISCONNECT ..... Indian Intellectuals like Rajaji or Menon or similar ilk, who were rooted in their native values, could not fathom, this Moral Dilemma of leaders of Western Hemisphere.....These Indian Intellectuals firmly rooted in their values, can talk same essence even in their temples, or in their national parliamentary houses or even in the international forums.......There is nothing DISCONNECT for them....Their western counterparts do not have that choice... C RajaGopalachari... 'India has her importance in the world, and knowledge of the basic elements of India's culture would enable people to understand her better. The Govt. of India is secular in the sense that the state does not support one religion or the other. But this does not mean the people of India have given up their Spiritual and Moral Doctrines in which they have been brought up, which form the basis of all their culture and which qualify and shape future additions to that culture'... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gana Yaswanth Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaitra Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Pseudo nationalists and pseudo secularits ee desam ni rule chesinantha kaala ilay untadhi......there is no pride of being an Indian in the elite class.....what signal does it send...... See these elite congress man in contrast with a RSS raised men.....he lives with pride with 2 pairs of clothes he has,and walks with his head held high,with no malice what so ever in his heart...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.