Jump to content

Federer wins French Open


Kiran

Recommended Posts

But Greatest Of All time maattram kaademoooo.....May nt b as perfect as Sampras ...

 

 

Sampras faced many gud , talented players bt Roger ki 1-2 main oppnonents anthee...So I Dont think hez the greatest of all times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya monnatavariki sampras annaru, but i guess federer ivala title tho replaced him I guess, mcenroe adhe point chesadu.

 

Sampras never won french open, infact semifinals varaku max vachadu, but federer already 3-4 times finals lo poyadu, ivala gelisadu.

 

ofcourse sampras time lo great players unnaru, so its arguable, but guess federer will win couple more grandslams. So unless someone crosses him in titles he will remain all time great in majority people's minds. Ippudu great players lerani kadhu, ippudu main consistency ledhu players lo anthakamundhu laga, ippudantha powerplay ekkuva, so fitness levels are dropping drastically as players are getting exhausted with power plays. so ee time lo kuda aa fitness maintain chesthu last 16 grandslams lo 15 lo final ki ratam anedhi its a rear feat only possible for federer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Federer is a biggest fan of Sampras.... But one fine time Sampras told Federer is best than him... they have respect each other... why controversies between us...

 

Evari personal opinions vallavi.... But ippudunna time lo Federer best antaru andaru... May be Sampras best emooo kanee... Long time world 1st rank lo vunna one and only player in any kind of game is Federer...  Ippudu 2nd lo vundachu ee season ayye lopu Feddy fans andaram 1st ki raavali ani wish cheddam...

 

Ippudu matram manchi valllu enduku leru... Federer vachina rojullo Agassi manchi form lo vunnadu... chala mandi manchi players vunnaru... Legend ante anni courts lo titles sadinchali ( Mana Daivam NTR raninchi  nattu ) so ee visayam looo Federer ee best emooo.... he rocks in all types of courts...

 

SO FANS WISH HIM FOR THIS SEASON... WISH TO BREAK THE RECORDS ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Federer is in an era where he does not have much competeition.

 

Sampras vunna time lo 4-5 all time greats vunnaru...

 

Aggassi, Lendl, Swedish player peru marchi poya..

 

Federer is good player but he is not tested enough by competition.

 

Stefan Edberg atani peeru. Jim Courier was also from Sampras time  :) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Federer is good player but he is not tested enough by competition.

 

Ala enthuku anukuntav, federer domination valla evaru anatla anukovachu ga ;D, even pete says the era roger played is hard, because of powerplay etc. alanti time lo kuda power ni grace tho mix chesi aduthunnadu ante adu mamulodu kadhu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Ala enthuku anukuntav, federer domination valla evaru anatla anukovachu ga ;D, even pete says the era roger played is hard, because of powerplay etc. alanti time lo kuda power ni grace tho mix chesi aduthunnadu ante adu mamulodu kadhu.

 

COmpetition ledhu antunna...This is the reason, Tennis does not appeal now  a days as Sampras era. I can still name 7-8 players who played that time. It used to be interesting from quarter finals..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

COmpetition ledhu antunna...This is the reason, Tennis does not appeal now  a days as Sampras era. I can still name 7-8 players who played that time. It used to be interesting from quarter finals..

 

Nenu undhi anukuntunna, but federer continuous wins and domination valla migathavallaki asala star image ratalla except nadal. Also poweplay valla consistency maintain cheyalante kashtam ee kalam lo.

 

ivanisevic fan nenu federer mundhu  :) 1hr lo moosesthadu game ni vadi day aithe   :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eee link lo choodandi..Winners list vundhi..

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Grand_Slam_Men%27s_Singles_champions

 

1992 nunchi 2002 varaku sampras era anukunte,

 

I see 7-8 great players...

 

Aggasi

Lendl,

Stephen Edberg

Boris Becker

Jim Courier

Ivani Sevick

Peter Korda

Patrick Rafter

Richard Krajeck

 

Lot of good players ..even though some of them won few grandslams, they always gave good fight  for sampras...

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roger ki Nadal thappa asalu potine ledu..Nadal koodaa only 2 yrs nunchi poti isthunnadu.. Roger won  10 grandslams when there was no one to give any sort of resistance forget abt beating him.. ;D Where as In Sampras Era..atleast 5-6 people used to have real chances for winning any grandslam..But still Pete won 14 grandslams.. ;D

 

Now a days,only the matches bw Roger n Nadal r worthwatching .. :'( IMO,Roger may end up winning 17 to 20 GMs , but (atleast)for me,He's no match for Pete  ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...