Jump to content

#KAElection: SC to hear Congress petition at 1.45 am


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, Munna_NTR said:

 

brahmiconfused.gif

idi coorect undi ::

 

Court orally remarks it wont restrain swearing-in but will issue notice and hear the other side and decide. No order passed yet. (Only oral remark by Justice AK Sikri).

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, chanti149 said:

Bjp claiming majority letter asked by bench...!!

Adi not just singhvu....but bjl lawyers deggara kuda ledanta ga....lolllll...that itself shows fishyyyy

asalu antha majority untene ga letter undedi ? aa 104 ee untadi unna kooda..adi chupettaleru gaa ipuudu ? kontha mandini konna tarvatha chupistharu ? :D 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mukul Rohatgi is now responding to the submission of Abhishek Manu Singhvi relating to Goa election case of 2017.

"Its an order. Hence not a binding precedent and lays down no law", Rohatgi.

 

"Secondly,INCIndia never staked a claim to form government in Goa. If you dont stake a claim then how will it help you", Mukul Rohatgi.

"This was not a case which should have been heard now. In Yakub Memon's case the man was going to be hanged at 6 am. There is nothing like that here", Mukul Rohatgi.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Kiran said:

judgement not concluded, singhvi dude trying fingering

Not fingering...he thigh slapped uncle....

He asked court to direct bjp to produce that letter of claiming majority...and if they produce it..i am out of this case...otherwise i am in ......hahahaha

Link to post
Share on other sites

"This was not a case which should have been heard now. In Yakub Memon's case the man was going to be hanged at 6 am. There is nothing like that here", Mukul Rohatgi

"That is the highest form of trivialisation", retorts Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

 

"Governor has immunity. You cannot call him or issue notice to him. But his actions can be subject to judicial review. I am challenging his decision though he cannot be made liable for the same", Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

 

"His actions are fully reviewable", Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mukul Rohatgi still hasn't told the court (he hasn't been asked either) who he is appearing for. He says some two BJP MLAs. He says "sorry we had to wake you up at night. This is not a case that deserves a hearing at midnight" ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The issue is can we injunct him? Of course his actions are subject to judicial review", Justice SA Bobde.

 

Justice SA Bobde also says the question is of 'injunction' and not 'stay'. "Stay is of an order. But injunction is against a 'person'. So can we injunct a person to whom we cannot issue notice"

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, chanti149 said:

Aa sarle uncle...briefed me deal entha...??

meeku siggu undadu,untey ila bjp ki support seyyaru

siggu malina raajakeyyalu

oka 5 years janala mandate ichina govt. ni ruling cheyyanivaru

it raids,vidwamsam,bedirimpulu,istam vachinattu mla's ni koni bjp 21 states bjp 21 states ani dappu

em ruling chesarani ee 5 years lo ayithey foreign tours ledantey election tours idega chesindi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...