Jump to content

#KAElection: SC to hear Congress petition at 1.45 am


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
6 minutes ago, Munna_NTR said:

 

brahmiconfused.gif

idi coorect undi ::

 

Court orally remarks it wont restrain swearing-in but will issue notice and hear the other side and decide. No order passed yet. (Only oral remark by Justice AK Sikri).

Posted
1 minute ago, prakhyat said:

idi coorect undi ::

 

Court orally remarks it wont restrain swearing-in but will issue notice and hear the other side and decide. No order passed yet. (Only oral remark by Justice AK Sikri).

Written order at 5am emo

Posted

Can Governor be interdicted? Dialogue between Mukul Rohatgi and Justice SA Bobde.

 

"Can you restrain the Governor from signing a bill? No, it is completely misconceived", Mukul Rohatgi.

Posted

Bjp claiming majority letter asked by bench...!!

Adi not just singhvu....but bjl lawyers deggara kuda ledanta ga....lolllll...that itself shows fishyyyy

Posted
Just now, chanti149 said:

Bjp claiming majority letter asked by bench...!!

Adi not just singhvu....but bjl lawyers deggara kuda ledanta ga....lolllll...that itself shows fishyyyy

asalu antha majority untene ga letter undedi ? aa 104 ee untadi unna kooda..adi chupettaleru gaa ipuudu ? kontha mandini konna tarvatha chupistharu ? :D 

Posted

But if at all...later on governor decision is reversed....it will be even more shameful for yeddi...swear in chesi malli cancel tooch ante....lolllllll...first person avtademo ila

Posted
1 minute ago, prakhyat said:

asalu antha majority untene ga letter undedi ? aa 104 ee untadi unna kooda..adi chupettaleru gaa ipuudu ? kontha mandini konna tarvatha chupistharu ? :D 

Ade ga....chodali em produce chestaro court ki reply lo

Posted
1 minute ago, vinayak said:

Image may contain: text

Vellu ipudu akada govt kulchesthe poidi...maku kuda 100cr ivali like karnataka...otherwise support withdraw cheskuntam ani...

Posted

Mukul Rohatgi is now responding to the submission of Abhishek Manu Singhvi relating to Goa election case of 2017.

"Its an order. Hence not a binding precedent and lays down no law", Rohatgi.

 

"Secondly,INCIndia never staked a claim to form government in Goa. If you dont stake a claim then how will it help you", Mukul Rohatgi.

"This was not a case which should have been heard now. In Yakub Memon's case the man was going to be hanged at 6 am. There is nothing like that here", Mukul Rohatgi.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Kiran said:

judgement not concluded, singhvi dude trying fingering

Not fingering...he thigh slapped uncle....

He asked court to direct bjp to produce that letter of claiming majority...and if they produce it..i am out of this case...otherwise i am in ......hahahaha

Posted

"This was not a case which should have been heard now. In Yakub Memon's case the man was going to be hanged at 6 am. There is nothing like that here", Mukul Rohatgi

"That is the highest form of trivialisation", retorts Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

 

"Governor has immunity. You cannot call him or issue notice to him. But his actions can be subject to judicial review. I am challenging his decision though he cannot be made liable for the same", Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

 

"His actions are fully reviewable", Abhishek Manu Singhvi.

Posted

Mukul Rohatgi still hasn't told the court (he hasn't been asked either) who he is appearing for. He says some two BJP MLAs. He says "sorry we had to wake you up at night. This is not a case that deserves a hearing at midnight" ?

Posted
4 minutes ago, chanti149 said:

Aa sarle uncle...briefed me deal entha...??

Daniki bjp chesedaniki chala difference undi ga bro,vote ki note you can link it with ahmed patel case, ikkada issue veru 

Posted
6 minutes ago, chanu@ntrfan said:

feel shy @Kiran

enti aa bengali batch edho vagithe daniki shy feel avvala, nuvvu avvu kali ga unnav ga :slapn:

Posted

"The issue is can we injunct him? Of course his actions are subject to judicial review", Justice SA Bobde.

 

Justice SA Bobde also says the question is of 'injunction' and not 'stay'. "Stay is of an order. But injunction is against a 'person'. So can we injunct a person to whom we cannot issue notice"

Posted
7 minutes ago, chanti149 said:

Aa sarle uncle...briefed me deal entha...??

meeku siggu undadu,untey ila bjp ki support seyyaru

siggu malina raajakeyyalu

oka 5 years janala mandate ichina govt. ni ruling cheyyanivaru

it raids,vidwamsam,bedirimpulu,istam vachinattu mla's ni koni bjp 21 states bjp 21 states ani dappu

em ruling chesarani ee 5 years lo ayithey foreign tours ledantey election tours idega chesindi

Posted
2 minutes ago, Kiran said:

enti aa bengali batch edho vagithe daniki shy feel avvala, nuvvu avvu kali ga unnav ga :slapn:

vallu vagindendi abbandam kaduga

100 kakapoyina entha isthunaro seppandi

:buttkick:

Posted
5 minutes ago, chanu@ntrfan said:

amith shah modi kcr jagga pk deal antha

Briefed me lo entho ikada anthe....shy lanti pedda matalu deniki le....lollll

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...