raaz Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Oka Abbayi 3-4 ammayila to sex lo palgonte and aa okko ammayi 3-4 abbayiala to sex lo palgonte ee ammaini ee abbayiki ichchi pelli cheyyali..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Media has a dirty habit for making everything sensational...by conveniently removing statements out of context...... inthaki aa case enti? aa court Judge complete statement ekkadanna undhaa brother....then we can talk about this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted June 18, 2013 Author Share Posted June 18, 2013 Media has a dirty habit for making everything sensational...by conveniently removing statements out of context...... inthaki aa case enti? aa court Judge complete statement ekkadanna undhaa brother....then we can talk about this... ..if any couple choose to consummate their sexual cravings, then that act becomes a total commitment with adherence to all consequences that may follow, except on certain exceptional considerations," Justice C S Karnan said in his order. He said that marriage formalities of tying a mangalsutra, garlands and rings were only for the satisfaction of society. Either party could approach a family court for declaration of marital status by producing documentary proof for a sexual relationship. The judge also said once such a declaration is obtained, the couple can establish self as each others' spouse in any government records. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted June 18, 2013 Author Share Posted June 18, 2013 "This court is of the view that if a bachelor has completed 21 years of age and a spinster is 18 years of age, then they can acquire the freedom of choice as guaranteed by the Constituion. If the couple chooses to consummate their sexual cravings, then the act becomes a total commitment with adherence to all consequences that may follow. Therefore, the usual marriage formalities such as tying of thaali, exchange of garlands, exchanging rings and circling around matrimonial fire pit or registering at a registration office, are to comply with certain religious customs and for the satisfaction of the society." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted June 18, 2013 Author Share Posted June 18, 2013 Media has a dirty habit for making everything sensational...by conveniently removing statements out of context...... inthaki aa case enti? aa court Judge complete statement ekkadanna undhaa brother....then we can talk about this... If these reports are to be believed, I think this is the one of the worst decisions of all time in the Indian judiciary system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dravidict Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 ..if any couple choose to consummate their sexual cravings, then that act becomes a total commitment with adherence to all consequences that may follow, except on certain exceptional considerations," Justice C S Karnan said in his order. He said that marriage formalities of tying a mangalsutra, garlands and rings were only for the satisfaction of society. Either party could approach a family court for declaration of marital status by producing documentary proof for a sexual relationship. The judge also said once such a declaration is obtained, the couple can establish self as each others' spouse in any government records. Old sex tapes are the new marriage videos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 ..if any couple choose to consummate their sexual cravings, then that act becomes a total commitment with adherence to all consequences that may follow, except on certain exceptional considerations," Justice C S Karnan said in his order. He said that marriage formalities of tying a mangalsutra, garlands and rings were only for the satisfaction of society. Either party could approach a family court for declaration of marital status by producing documentary proof for a sexual relationship. The judge also said once such a declaration is obtained, the couple can establish self as each others' spouse in any government records. its incomplete and clueless brother...what I have read is different....but I am not finding the source where I have read, if not I would have posted it here... naaku gurthunna meraku....oka muslim ammai ni evado mosam chesaadu.....and then refused to marry her..aa sandarbamga aa ammai court lo case file chesthe...aa ammai ki anukoolam judge ichchina theerpu idhi...naaku gurthunnameraku... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted June 18, 2013 Author Share Posted June 18, 2013 its incomplete and clueless brother...what I have read is different....but I am not finding the source where I have read, if not I would have posted it here... naaku gurthunna meraku....oka muslim ammai ni evado mosam chesaadu.....and then refused to marry her..aa sandarbamga aa ammai court lo case file chesthe...aa ammai ki anukoolam judge ichchina theerpu idhi...naaku gurthunnameraku... The judge was passing orders on a petition filed by a Muslim woman, who sought maintenance for herself and her two children from her estranged husband. The woman in her case said that though they got married in 1994 and lived together till 1999, her husband deserted the family all of a sudden and refused to pay for its day to day expenses. The man, however, denied such a marriage and said he and the woman were merely co-employees at a footwear godown. However, a Coimbatore court found evidence that they had lived together when a doctor informed during trial court that the man had signed all papers in his capacity as husband and also gave consent for the caesarian performed on the woman during her second child birth. The trial court ordered monthly maintenance of Rs 500 each to the children in 2000, but said the woman is not eligible for the relief as the marriage was not registered. Justice Karnan, however, concluded that this is indeed a valid marriage because the two lived like husband and wife under one roof, and also begot two children. Both of them did not have any encumbrance or disqualification for solemnization of their marriage and the husband had openly and officially acknowledged her as his wife when he gave consent for the caesarian operation. "Illegitimate relationship does not arise in this case. Marriage solemnization is only a customary right and obligation, but not a mandatory one." Because of their sexual relationship, they had been elevated to the level of husband and wife, Justice Karnan said, adding, "Therefore, the children born to them are legitimate children." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dravidict Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Why is it ridiculous? Because it is encouraging live-in relationships. Because a dating couple is considered to be married only if there is a proof that there is evidence for sexual relationship. Because it may increase the prostitution beyond imagination. People may indulge in prostitution and if police caught they can claim that they are in a live-in relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 The judge was passing orders on a petition filed by a Muslim woman, who sought maintenance for herself and her two children from her estranged husband. The woman in her case said that though they got married in 1994 and lived together till 1999, her husband deserted the family all of a sudden and refused to pay for its day to day expenses. The man, however, denied such a marriage and said he and the woman were merely co-employees at a footwear godown. However, a Coimbatore court found evidence that they had lived together when a doctor informed during trial court that the man had signed all papers in his capacity as husband and also gave consent for the caesarian performed on the woman during her second child birth. The trial court ordered monthly maintenance of Rs 500 each to the children in 2000, but said the woman is not eligible for the relief as the marriage was not registered. Justice Karnan, however, concluded that this is indeed a valid marriage because the two lived like husband and wife under one roof, and also begot two children. Both of them did not have any encumbrance or disqualification for solemnization of their marriage and the husband had openly and officially acknowledged her as his wife when he gave consent for the caesarian operation. "Illegitimate relationship does not arise in this case. Marriage solemnization is only a customary right and obligation, but not a mandatory one." Because of their sexual relationship, they had been elevated to the level of husband and wife, Justice Karnan said, adding, "Therefore, the children born to them are legitimate children." Good judgement but wrong choice of words.....nothing else...that is how I see it.... again it is media, which likes to play its dirtiest game to its best...by choosing to spread what it wants to.....can't expect more from a foreign funded media... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dravidict Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Good judgement but wrong choice of words.....nothing else...that is how I see it.... again it is media, which likes to play its dirtiest game to its best...by choosing to spread what it wants to.....can't expect more from a foreign funded media... The incident hog the lime light because it was reported by "The Hindu". If it was for any other news paper, people wouldn't have given much weightage to the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raaz Posted June 18, 2013 Author Share Posted June 18, 2013 Good judgement but wrong choice of words.....nothing else...that is how I see it.... again it is media, which likes to play its dirtiest game to its best...by choosing to spread what it wants to.....can't expect more from a foreign funded media... If u know abt media and u r in a most decision making position u should be very careful while framing the words in your judgements kada brother.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nekkanti Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Why is it ridiculous? Because it is encouraging live-in relationships. Because a dating couple is considered to be married only if there is a proof that there is evidence for sexual relationship. Because it may increase the prostitution beyond imagination. People may indulge in prostitution and if police caught they can claim that they are in a live-in relationship. You can always do that. Raid jarginappudu marriage cheskomanu its fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nekkanti Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Full case context chusthunte thappuga emi anipinchatam ledhu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dravidict Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 You can always do that. Raid jarginappudu marriage cheskomanu its fine As per the judgment, even Thaali/Ring is not mandatory. If they are living together and if they are having sex then it equates to marriage. So, they can say that, we are living together and we are having intercourse, so we're married. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 The incident hog the lime light because it was reported by "The Hindu". If it was for any other news paper, people wouldn't have given much weightage to the issue. Let me tell you..."The Hindu" is one xxxxxxx sold-out newspaper...there is nothing Hindu in it...except the name Hindu.... Gone are the days where this particular newspaper had its sheen...its not there any longer... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dravidict Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 Ayina sex kosam Prostitute dhaggariki vellina vadiki Donga pelli chesukovatam problem avvadhu. Iddharu ok anukuni dandalu marchesukuntaru. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chsrk Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 If u know abt media and u r in a most decision making position u should be very careful while framing the words in your judgements kada brother.. Humans are bound to make mistakes brother...rather than highlighting the positives of the judgment, why is this bull-shit media giving unnecessary coverage to the shit element in that....obviously they have their own interest....not just to increase their TRP ratings.....but also to subdue and assualt native culture...for their masters are Foreign and not Indian.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.