KaNTRhi Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 parliament is supreme anedhi most fundamental concept in indian democracy. "supreme court" lo supreme ane padam undhi kada ani adhi supreme anukunte nenu emi cheyalenu. lets not discuss this bro. silly stuff. ok le leave it....sooner u will get to know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jassu Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 TG valaki nijam ga manam maryada etc etc unte valu demand chesinattu 1956 ki mundu di mathrame maku kavali anaru badhrachalam maku icheyali ..hyd ni common capital for 10 years ante ne harish rao gadu kukka edupu edistunadu... ma pettu badulu mire tini ma places ni mire kabja chesi tenkithe asala mimalni em anali dacoits ki ante darunam ga unnaru ra baboiii Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urban Legend Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 lets not discuss this bro. wat will u discuss about bedar ? bhadrachalam antey lets not discuss its ours antaru.......... if there's nothing to discuss y do u involve in a discussion.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaNTRhi Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 wat will u discuss about bedar ? bhadrachalam antey lets not discuss its ours antaru.......... if there's nothing to discuss y do u involve in a discussion.. Adi kadu, Suprem Court ra andariki babu ante..kadu Parlament antadu endi eee doraa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urban Legend Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Adi kadu, Suprem Court ra andariki babu ante..kadu Parlament antadu endi eee doraa parliament ki undey rights parliament ki unnayi le Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaNTRhi Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 parliament ki undey rights parliament ki unnayi le Yes, kani Parliament chese prathi danni question chese right 'Supreme' ki unda ledaa ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vamsik_hyd Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 wat will u discuss about bedar ? bhadrachalam antey lets not discuss its ours antaru.......... if there's nothing to discuss y do u involve in a discussion.. let me clarify something brother. yes, u guys are right if ur point is that KCR has asked for TG, as it was in 1956. agreed. not denying this fact. kani, KCR central govt kadu kada brothers..he can only 'ask', and not decide. exactly similar to how our RajaNTR bro from east godavari is asking for badrachalam to be clubbed into his dist. mana 'asks' antu chala untayi brother. ala adagatam lo thappu mummatiki ledu. we should ask. but ultimately, we need to accept the fact that we are not among the ones who 'decides'. we are just 'takers' while govt of india is the ultimate 'giver'. inko example, KCR vehemently opposed polavaram project but today center has taken a decision to not only move ahead with it but also sponsor it, do you think KCR can fight against govt of india's decision and win this case? even if such a possibility exists, it will take at least a decade to lead that movement, and by that time polavaram will be in its complete shape. naku unna knowledge paranga nenu cheppalanukunna point okkate. central govt will 'most likely' continue with current form and boundaries of TG. adding or subtracting anything will invite endless list of issues. example- 1956 mundhu, i guess, there are many other small regions..which were made part of other states during formation of AP. hence it makes all sense for central govt to confine this issue to just TG & AP and not involve Karnataka or Maharashtra into it. and this is basis to my argument on why center will not play around with boundaries but instead will continue as it exists today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urban Legend Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 mana 'asks' antu chala untayi brother. ala adagatam lo thappu mummatiki ledu. we should ask. but ultimately, we need to accept the fact that we are not among the ones who 'decides'. we are just 'takers' while govt of india is the ultimate 'giver'. Its very easy to say now ... have u said the same if TG is not announced or Hyd is made as UT or Hyd is common capital .. will u accept the ultimate giver decision ? inko example, KCR vehemently opposed polavaram project but today center has taken a decision to not only move ahead with it but also sponsor it, do you think KCR can fight against govt of india's decision and win this case? even if such a possibility exists, it will take at least a decade to lead that movement, and by that time polavaram will be in its complete shape. just that KCR has accepted the govt decision, does that mean everyone should accept the decision, and no more discussions should happen 99% of tg wants are address so y will he oppose & become a vilian or who knows what intrest KCR has in polavaram project, as said by TDP his men might be the ones that's constructing it naku unna knowledge paranga nenu cheppalanukunna point okkate. central govt will 'most likely' continue with current form and boundaries of TG ya central govt will most likely do that ...that doesn't mean we have to accept it and go on, ppl wil discuss debate and if needed ppl will agitate adding or subtracting anything will invite endless list of issues. example- 1956 mundhu, i guess, there are many other small regions..which were made part of other states during formation of AP. hence it makes all sense for central govt to confine this issue to just TG & AP and not involve Karnataka or Maharashtra into it. and this is basis to my argument on why center will not play around with boundaries but instead will continue as it exists today. why will additions and subs invite endless list of issues ...from whom it will invite ... u ppl dn't want an inch more na .. then why will ur leader or anyone oppose it ?...u ppl want b'chalam also andhuke ur saying all this accept it bedar Karnataka & maharastra are not part of AP so they r out of picture...Its about the AP state bifurcation so what ever the regions, boundaries within the AP should be looked into .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vamsik_hyd Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 response inline.. Its very easy to say now ... have u said the same if TG is not announced or Hyd is made as UT or Hyd is common capital .. will u accept the ultimate giver decision ? <<certainly we would not have accepted, and we are fully prepared to wage a long battle..the movement already in place for TG would continue. but little more or less, we got what we asked for..the TG with 10 districts and at the max, hyd as common capital not exceeding 10 years>> just that KCR has accepted the govt decision, does that mean everyone should accept the decision, and no more discussions should happen 99% of tg wants are address so y will he oppose & become a vilian or who knows what intrest KCR has in polavaram project, as said by TDP his men might be the ones that's constructing it <<who said KCR accepted the decision on polavaram.., but the point TG people are trying to make is that the decision is largely in our favour, a liitle leeway at this stage is ok, and hence i believe polavaram will not be objected by TG people at this stage..this is my personal opinion>> ya central govt will most likely do that ...that doesn't mean we have to accept it and go on, ppl wil discuss debate and if needed ppl will agitate <<yes, my earlier posts are crystal clear on this point, if you think something is rightfully yours, please take it to streets and agitate..ultimately, if your cause is good, and conviction is right, u will win one day or another. remember, this favorable stand on TG by central govt is a fruit of a verrry long battle TG people fought against the system. in such cases, success will be yours only when you are prepared to fight a long battle. debates are just not good enough. again, remember that people in TG debated for over 50 years with no real success. only when they got to streets, preparing themselves for a looong battle, they won.>> why will additions and subs invite endless list of issues ...from whom it will invite ... u ppl dn't want an inch more na .. then why will ur leader or anyone oppose it ?...u ppl want b'chalam also andhuke ur saying all this accept it bedar Karnataka & maharastra are not part of AP so they r out of picture...Its about the AP state bifurcation so what ever the regions, boundaries within the AP should be looked into .. <<if one has to consider KCR's demand for TG at the time of 1956, then other states will automatically come into picture. hyd state was bigger than what TG is today. since its not practical, central govt will not disturb the boundaries. again, like i said, if you believe your demand is 'just', please prepare yourselves to wage a long battle- may success be all yours.>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urban Legend Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 certainly we would not have accepted, and we are fully prepared to wage a long battle..the movement already in place for TG would continue. but little more or less, we got what we asked for..the TG with 10 districts and at the max, hyd as common capital not exceeding 10 years>> mari y giving us geethopadesam bedar .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urban Legend Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 response inline.. wrong ga anukoku bedar em response bedar adhi .....tg agitation gurinchi thappa em aina undha andhulo . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vamsik_hyd Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 mari y giving us geethopadesam bedar .... bro, the Q to me was 'why bhadrachalam will be part of TG when u didn't ask for it..' hope i answered that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urban Legend Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 who said KCR accepted the decision on polavaram.., but the point TG people are trying to make is that the decision is largely in our favour, a liitle leeway at this stage is ok, and hence i believe polavaram will not be objected by TG people at this stage..this is my personal opinion accept chestunnam ani cheppi ... tg vachina tarvatha ila parties survival kosam malli edo oka agitations plans vesara bedar... every one knows it le bedar tg parties intentions ..inkhentha mandhini baligontaro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urban Legend Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 bro, the Q to me was 'why bhadrachalam will be part of TG when u didn't ask for it..' hope i answered that. adhi nijame le bedar ...theraga vastundhi ga Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaNTRhi Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 adhi nijame le bedar ...theraga vastundhi ga Already ivi anni dobbesaru Ade thambi ee Statistics tho...bigger state name cheppi..Research inistitutes, Educational Inistitutes, Industrial factories, Pharma Industry, IT, MMTS, Metro, Ring road and International Airport...inni thisukundi veellu.....appanam ga dobbeddam anukunte assalu kudaradu... danni kooda add chesukovadame list lo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.