vinayak Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1040537/foreign-aid-UK-india-330-million-giant-bronze-statue-sardar-patel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinayak Posted November 7, 2018 Author Share Posted November 7, 2018 BRITONS are outraged after the Indian government spent hundreds of millions of pounds on a giant bronze statue while the Uk was sending £1.17billion in overseas aid to the country. While the UK was sending India £1.17billion in aid, the Indian government was spending nearly half that amount on the world’s tallest statue. This new statue is twice the height of the US’ Statue of Liberty and has been met with condemnation for the large bill that it carried. Over the 56 months it took to build India’s Statue of Unity, the government spent around £330million of UK taxpayer’s aid. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended the statue’s unveiling It stands in Mr Modi’s home state of Gujarat at the XXXX of the Narmada river. The Prime Minister was the chief minister of Gujarat when the statue was first commissioned. Construction began in 2012 when the UK sent India nearly £300million. Then, in 2013, the UK sent another £268billion followed by £278million in 2014 and £185million in 2015. Since then, the UK has sent India smaller sums. While this money was coming in, India was spending much of it to build the 579ft bronze replica of a hero of India’s independence movement, Sardar Patel. In response to this, Tory MP Peter Bone said: “To take £1.1billion in aid from us and then at the same time spend £330million on a statue is a total nonsense and it is the sort of thing that drives people mad. “What it proves is that we should not be giving money to India. It is up to them how they spend their money but if they can afford this statue, then it is clearly a country we should not need to be giving aid to.” The aid money was also spent on various programmes ranging from improving women’s rights to funding solar panels to investment in low-carbon transport. In 2014, around £14,000 was spent in Gujarat to increase religious tolerance among young people. While the UK did not directly fund the statue, the money was spent on programmes that the government could not have afforded if they had been using their own money on building the monument. t took 3,500 workers four years to build and it also saw a massive land-grab that affected 72 nearby villages that, according to tribal chiefs, forced thousand out of their homes. Upon its unveiling, helicopters flew overhead and dropped rose petals during Mr Modi’s speech. Britain’s former International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell said in 2012 that the UK would stop ending India aid in 2015, but £92.6million was sent to India last year. The UK has funded schemes in India including £86.616 to see if yoga helps people have heart attacks and another £100.000 to bring female scientists from India to Cambridge. While the Department of International Development has said that it ended its traditional aid to India in 2015, but they are still giving some funding to help boost their economy and to try to counter climate change. A spokesman said: “The UK now provides world-leading expertise and private investment – while generating a return for the UK – to boost prosperity, create jobs and open up markets, which is firmly in our interests.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiran Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Already disco over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nfdbno1 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 idi waste disco... something that will boomerang and favour bjp instead! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nfdbno1 Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 UK ending aid to India: Where does the money go? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-34398449 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAYAM_NANI Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 6 hours ago, Nfdbno1 said: idi waste disco... something that will boomerang and favour bjp instead! Why should we think so? Are we so blind to take up a point which Briton says? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu_Boss Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 How come BJP is wasting money on useless statues .. that to using foreign funds they should be utilised for development not for political purposes.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sskmaestro Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 1 hour ago, Bollu_Boss said: How come BJP is wasting money on useless statues .. that to using foreign funds they should be utilised for development not for political purposes.. 3k crores investment is nothing for a country like India. That too when you get a chance to make it tallest in the world. But here are my concerns 1. If BJP believes that Sardar is a National figure, greater than Gandhi, Nehru and deserves to be the first PM of India, why should you restrict him to GJ ? Can’t the statue be in the center of the country? 2. Do MoSha really deserve to built the statue of “unity”? After the list of things they have done, do they really qualify to declare themselves as heirs of Sardar? 3. Statue of Unity antaru. Kharchu (direct or indirect expense) Desam meeda ruddandi.... dani nunchi vachey Aadayam Gujarat ki dhaara poyyandi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollu_Boss Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 First 2 points I am aware why they are doing.. 3rd point was most valid point .. i didnt see that angle.. If they use 3000 crs of whole indian money to built.. How the return money is using is it for Gujarat only.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.