AnnaGaru Posted March 21, 2018 Author Share Posted March 21, 2018 30,000 tons DAILY PORT activity from plant guarantee icharu villu vallu Bandar port preferences tho vacharu...kani mana janalu cheda gottukunaru...Yes, emi kavalo adagali kani Jaffa matalu vini GOLDEN opportunity ni chedagottukunamu.... This is what CBN has been telling why he wanted 5000+ acres for Bandar port industrial corridor....PORT can't succeed without EXPORT/IMPORT demand industry/goods near it. e okka project tho 15,000 people employment near Bandar ayyedi. Krishna west&T subabulu farmers ki golden days...subabulu rate ledu tough times anukune time lo villu vacharu... Kirshnapatnam port lo CBN kastam&burada malli repeat anukunna same adi jarugutundi....a roju Kirshnapatnam forceful ga velladu election lo ZERO seats vahcai dani valla. hitachi also wanted to set agri export in Bandar port....adi kooda paye anukovachu... Jaffas protest vinte inte untundi......PORT matrame kattukovali anta enduku neeku port bayata land ani nakincharu... malli decoit gadu matram MAYTAS ki iste correct..CBN itla real world leaders testunte protests Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotcha Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 Logical ga alochiste chitoir tirupathi atu vaipu no rains so akkada petaleru west krishna lo pedite best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVSDev Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 paper mill vacchi - manchi price isthaam anteyyy ye area farmers ayinaa Subabul and Eucalyptus veshtaaru bhayyaa - less cost and guaranteed price support from industry with Govt. guarantee - farmers will be happy to cultivate - these days ITC and other paper mills formed syndicate and cheating farmers - so many appeals to Govt - but they havent done much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravindras Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 On 3/20/2018 at 11:02 PM, swarnandhra said: this is biggest confusion for me. center is asking state government to chose alternative to Dugarajapatnam. State government refusing to do so and asking center to pick. There were several news articles on both. Why can't state government pick Ramayapatnam as alternative to Dugarajapatnam???????????????? it will affect cargo of krishnapatnam port. cbn may want to delay ramayapatnam and later give it to navayuga( krishnapatnam management). it reduces competition and benefit port developer. navayuga building machilipatnam port also. vizag port and vizag steel proposed joint venture to develop gangavaram port but cbn didn't agree to it. he went for ppp (revenue share to government is 2.1% for first 30 years, 4.2% for 31-40 years, 8.4 % for 41-50 years) cbn allocated krishnapatnam port under ppp for natco pharma promoter vc nannapaneni. natco promoter divested major stake to navayuga. in 2004 navayuga applied to state government(ysr rule) to revise revenue share as revenue share asked by state is too high which makes project unbankable. it asked state to revise the revenue share on the lines of gangavaram port. state government revised revenue share 2.6% for first 30 years, 5.2% for 31-40 years,10.4% for 41-50 years. bhavanapadu port gadkari asked state government to develop under center state partnership with ratio of 74% for center and 26% state. but cbn choose to go for ppp. state officer ajay jain said that stake is not equal to revenue share. suppose adani gives 2.3% of revenue to state. state will get every year this much income. if state government gets stake proposed by gadkari. it have to bear the losses also. everybody knows corruption and inefficiencies in govenment organization, why to take risk. there is strong reason for cbn choosing ppp. ppp ports have flexibility in developing based on traffic growth. flexibility in tarrif. no labor union problems. state government will get revenue without worrying operations about the project. in my opinion cbn not interested in center port. between 2019-2024 ramaypatnam port will be developed under ppp mostly by navayuga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swarnandhra Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 15 minutes ago, ravindras said: it will affect cargo of krishnapatnam port. cbn may want to delay ramayapatnam and later give it to navayuga( krishnapatnam management). it reduces competition and benefit port developer. navayuga building machilipatnam port also. vizag port and vizag steel proposed joint venture to develop gangavaram port but cbn didn't agree to it. he went for ppp (revenue share to government is 2.1% for first 30 years, 4.2% for 31-40 years, 8.4 % for 41-50 years) cbn allocated krishnapatnam port under ppp for natco pharma promoter vc nannapaneni. natco promoter divested major stake to navayuga. in 2004 navayuga applied to state government(ysr rule) to revise revenue share as revenue share asked by state is too high which makes project unbankable. it asked state to revise the revenue share on the lines of gangavaram port. state government revised revenue share 2.6% for first 30 years, 5.2% for 31-40 years,10.4% for 41-50 years. bhavanapadu port gadkari asked state government to develop under center state partnership with ratio of 74% for center and 26% state. but cbn choose to go for ppp. state officer ajay jain said that stake is not equal to revenue share. suppose adani gives 2.3% of revenue to state. state will get every year this much income. if state government gets stake proposed by gadkari. it have to bear the losses also. everybody knows corruption and inefficiencies in govenment organization, why to take risk. there is strong reason for cbn choosing ppp. ppp ports have flexibility in developing based on traffic growth. flexibility in tarrif. no labor union problems. state government will get revenue without worrying operations about the project. in my opinion cbn not interested in center port. between 2019-2024 ramaypatnam port will be developed under ppp mostly by navayuga. this makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.