Jump to content

Doola teerindhi


NatuGadu

Recommended Posts

what you said is very true brother.....

anukuvaga unde maa chellamma dorike sariki antha aayana prathibe anukuntunnaru Rao garu.....

teliyani vaallu meeru cheppindi  nijame anukuntaaru daatar goru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ee rojullo control lo pettaleka povatam anedi Mogudi chetha kani tanam anukolemu.. ippudu ammayilaki financial independence vachindi, enduku taggi vundali ane mentality baaga vachesindi.. ilanti situation lo control lo pettali anukonte roju godavalu ayyi life inka narakam ga tayyaru iddi. elagola Nacha cheppukovatam leda calm ga vundatam ante... Control lo pettukovataniki try chesthe max  vidipovatame iddi.. ee rojullo oka marriage avvatame kastam ga vundi inka 2nd marriage picha li8.. anduke janalu calm ga wife ni foloow ipothunnaru.

meeru cheppedi kooda convincing gaane unnadi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

amma puttinillu menamama ki thelvadha...maa chellelu kanuka ee anniah ki mirchi bajji esi pettindhi...meeru chepparani kaadhu...brahmam_enticounter_0.gif?1290368503

Meeku Bajji petti.. meerellaka naaku mirapakaya pettindi. Adi meeku telidu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wife Separating Man From Parents Ground For Divorce: Supreme Court
All India | Press Trust of India | Updated: October 08, 2016 00:34 IST
 
EMAIL
PRINT
COMMENTS
judge-court-generic-istock_650x400_81473
 

Court said a wife separating her husband and his parents is a western thought. (Representational Pic)

NEW DELHI:  It is a "pious obligation" of a son to maintain parents said the Supreme Court. Hence, persistent effort of a wife to constrain her husband to be separated from his family constitutes an act of 'cruelty' enabling him to get divorce, the Court added.

A bench of Justices Anil R Dave and L Nageshwara Rao made the observations while confirming the decree of divorce sought by a Karnataka-based man.

 
The order was passed while setting aside Karnataka High Court judgment which had dismissed the decree of divorce granted by a Bangalore family court in 2001.

"In a Hindu society, it is a pious obligation of the son to maintain the parents. If a wife makes an attempt to deviate from the normal practice and normal custom of the society, she must have some justifiable reason for that and, in this case, we do not find any justifiable reason, except monetary consideration of the wife," said the court,

"In our opinion, normally, no husband would tolerate this and no son would like to be separated from his old parents and other family members, who are also dependent upon his income.

The persistent effort of the wife to constrain the husband to be separated from the family would be torturous for husband and in our opinion, the trial court was right when it came to the conclusion that this constitutes an act of 'cruelty'," the top court said.

It further said, "It is not a common practice or desirable culture for a Hindu son in India to get separated from his parents on getting married at the instance of the wife, especially when the son is the only earning member in the family. A son, brought up and given education by his parents, has a moral and legal obligation to take care and maintain the parents, when they become old and when they have either no income or have a meagre income.

In the order, the court said that for a wife insisting her husband live separately from his parents is a western thought '"alien to our culture and ethos".

"In India, generally people do not subscribe to the western thought, where, upon getting married or attaining majority, the son gets separated from the family," the bench said.

"She becomes integral to and forms part of the family of the husband and normally without any justifiable strong reason, she would never insist that her husband should get separated from the family and live only with her," it said.

Noting that in the present case, the behaviour of the wife appeared to be "terrifying and horrible", Supreme Court said, "One would find it difficult to live with such a person with tranquility and peace of mind. Such torture would adversely affect the life of the husband."

The apex court confirmed the divorce of Karnataka-based couple who got married in 1992.

The lower court had granted the husband divorce after he alleged cruelty on his wife's part. However, later the high court had set aside the trial court's judgement after which the man went in appeal in the Supreme Court.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

okka koduke ayi pattinchukokapoinaa, iddaru mugguru vundi vanthulu vesukonnaa adhi dourbhagyame ... parents complain cheyyaru usual gaa sarudhuku poi kudirinannaalu elaago guttugaa survive avuthaaru..  kodukulaki maatram next generation lo 75-85% same treatment vuntundhi... matter of time anthe...

 

mana culture lo vunna easy solutions swardham tho vadhilesi edho saadhinchaam/sukapadaam ani brama padatam, kottha problems ni create chesukovatame... aa kotta problems ki mallee partial solutions antha satisfaction ivvalevemo :)    

 

thousands of years pattindhi ilaanti culture develop chesukovataaniki okka kshanam(one two generations) lo nela paalu chesukogaligina muurkhatvam manaki elaa sidhdhinchindho gaanee... drastic changes in lifestyles (too busy life for materialistic comforts) in last 20-50yrs may be a major helping fuel for this devastation besides other factors.. 

 

true. unfortunately, this is unavoidable next step in the process of nuclear family concept that has been accelerating. This type of environment is hard on children too. Lot of kids are really missing love and caring of grandparents. Daycare/preschool/nursery is no substitute for grand parents "love". Some people have no choice. and some get in to that situation by choice (main topic of this thread). Grandmothers other older female members of the group taking care of young ones has millions of years history in mammals dating back prior to human existence. we changed it all in mere 50 years !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wife Separating Man From Parents Ground For Divorce: Supreme Court
All India | Press Trust of India | Updated: October 08, 2016 00:34 IST
 
EMAIL
PRINT
COMMENTS
judge-court-generic-istock_650x400_81473
 

Court said a wife separating her husband and his parents is a western thought. (Representational Pic)

NEW DELHI:  It is a "pious obligation" of a son to maintain parents said the Supreme Court. Hence, persistent effort of a wife to constrain her husband to be separated from his family constitutes an act of 'cruelty' enabling him to get divorce, the Court added.

 

A bench of Justices Anil R Dave and L Nageshwara Rao made the observations while confirming the decree of divorce sought by a Karnataka-based man.

 

 
The order was passed while setting aside Karnataka High Court judgment which had dismissed the decree of divorce granted by a Bangalore family court in 2001.

 

"In a Hindu society, it is a pious obligation of the son to maintain the parents. If a wife makes an attempt to deviate from the normal practice and normal custom of the society, she must have some justifiable reason for that and, in this case, we do not find any justifiable reason, except monetary consideration of the wife," said the court,

 

"In our opinion, normally, no husband would tolerate this and no son would like to be separated from his old parents and other family members, who are also dependent upon his income.

 

The persistent effort of the wife to constrain the husband to be separated from the family would be torturous for husband and in our opinion, the trial court was right when it came to the conclusion that this constitutes an act of 'cruelty'," the top court said.

 

It further said, "It is not a common practice or desirable culture for a Hindu son in India to get separated from his parents on getting married at the instance of the wife, especially when the son is the only earning member in the family. A son, brought up and given education by his parents, has a moral and legal obligation to take care and maintain the parents, when they become old and when they have either no income or have a meagre income.

 

In the order, the court said that for a wife insisting her husband live separately from his parents is a western thought '"alien to our culture and ethos".

 

"In India, generally people do not subscribe to the western thought, where, upon getting married or attaining majority, the son gets separated from the family," the bench said.

 

"She becomes integral to and forms part of the family of the husband and normally without any justifiable strong reason, she would never insist that her husband should get separated from the family and live only with her," it said.

 

Noting that in the present case, the behaviour of the wife appeared to be "terrifying and horrible", Supreme Court said, "One would find it difficult to live with such a person with tranquility and peace of mind. Such torture would adversely affect the life of the husband."

 

The apex court confirmed the divorce of Karnataka-based couple who got married in 1992.

 

The lower court had granted the husband divorce after he alleged cruelty on his wife's part. However, later the high court had set aside the trial court's judgement after which the man went in appeal in the Supreme Court.

 

 

This ruling brings tears to my eyes ... I'm just glad some in power have conscience. 

 

Yet, I'm not one of those sons fulfilling the obligation to my parents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Antey chsrk Annai anni bajji lu tenesaru ani indirect ga chepparu ga JVC bro, edo joke annu don't take it seriously

Deenilo serious emundi bro.

But ala ani kaadu kaani. Vaalla annayya varaku bajjilu esi naaku pachi mirapakayalu migilchindi ani kavi bahavam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garikipati cheppinattu,. parents chinna pillalni hostel lo vesaru peddaina taruvatha pillalu parents ni oldage homes lo vesthunaru.......

Perma panchanappudu premani aasinchadam koda tappe....

 

You have a point there ... but, my parents didn't send me off to rid off their obligation  ... and I'm not doing my job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This ruling brings tears to my eyes ... I'm just glad some in power have conscience. 

 

Yet, I'm not one of those sons fulfilling the obligation to my parents.

if son not interested no one cares.... but he is interested and wife oppeses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what you said is very true brother.....

anukuvaga unde maa chellamma dorike sariki antha aayana prathibe anukuntunnaru Rao garu.....

 

Thanks bhayya.. Nenu 7+ years ga ee db follow avuthunna.. naaku mee posts chala nachuthayi..naa first post koda meeru open chesina oka topic lone vesanu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...