swas Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 Not our job to create HC, blaming Modi ‘intolerable’: Centre to Telangana TRS MP Kavitha alleged that Centre is being ‘insensitive’ by not bifurcating HC following division of Andhra Pradesh. Union Law Minister D V Sadandanda Gowda on Tuesday said the Centre has no role in creation of a new High Court for Telangana, rubbishing the ruling TRS' charge that Narendra Modi dispensation is being "insensitive" on the issue and dragging the matter under political pressure. Holding that the state government's stand on the issue is "unacceptable and intolerable," Gowda said creation of a new High Court is in the hands of the Chief Minister and Chief Justice of the common high court for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. "Creation of new High Court for Telangana is not in our hands, it’s in the hands of Chief Minister and Chief Justice of that High Court (which is common for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, and has not been bifurcated after the erstwhile state's division in June 2014)," Law Minister D V Sadandanda Gowda said. TRS MP Kavitha said that her father and Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao would not even hesitate to hold a protest in Delhi. She also alleged that the matter is being dragged by the Centre under political pressure from Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu. Countering the TRS on the issue, Gowda said, “If the Chief Minister provides the infrastructure and other things, High Court will take care of rest of the things. Simply putting the blame on Centre is not fair. It’s quite unacceptable and intolerable to say that this delay is because of the Central government.” Asked about Kavitha's charge, Gowda said, "If he holds a dharna for no reason, people will evaluate the dharna." "Judiciary is independent. We give maximum respect to Judiciary. Their independence cannot be encroached upon by the Executive at any point of time," he said. TRS has upped the ante on the issue in the backdrop of agitation by lawyers and judges against provisional allocation of judicial officers between AP and Telangana. The High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad has suspended eleven judges following the agitation against provisional allocation. Over 100 judges under the banner of Telangana Judges Association on Sunday took out a procession here in protest. Speaking on the issue, Kavitha told reporters that "Our Chief Minister is also very disheartened by the insensitivity of the central government. We do propose to go and express our protest in Delhi, but we do not want things to escalate to that level. Once again, we sincerely appeal to honourable Prime Minister to intervene at this juncture and bifurcate the high court." She said TRS MPs had raised the issue in Parliament and Rao himself represented to Modi "10 times" for bifurcation of the high court, but the latter has not responded so far, claiming that the Centre is under pressure from Andhra Pradesh CM. She said Congress President Sonia Gandhi also did not speak on the issue in Parliament, though she spoke about Andhra Pradesh's interests. Kavitha alleged that there is a "conspiracy" hatched by the Andhra Pradesh government and some "Andhra elders at the Centre" in "Andhra Judges" giving option to work in Telangana. Meanwhile, the BJP state unit supported the protest by Telangana judges but alleged that the Chief Minister's "protest now is purely political". "BJP supports Telangana judges' protest and the injustice being meted out to them. CM KCR is equally responsible for not acting on time, while the provisional list was in process.” "Governor in consultation with CJH (Chief Justice of High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad) and CM appoint district judges. What was KCR doing throughout this 5-6 month process? Why did not he protest when the list was notified in May 2016 by HC? His protest now is purely political," BJP spokesperson Krishna Saagar Rao said. Union minister Bandaru Dattatreya is expected to meet Union Home minister Rajnath Singh and Law minister Sadananda Gowda along with A Narasimha Reddy, Chairman, Bar Council of AP and Telangana in Delhi today in this regard, a BJP release said. ============ I don't think Kcr will go for dharna this time velthe Bjp will go more aggresively kcr can't even touch central Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naga Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 asalu emanukuntunnaru ee trs ollu judiciary ante????? anthaa veellaku nacchinatlu law raayalemo aakariki?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ntrforever Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 //Meanwhile, the BJP state unit supported the protest by Telangana judges but alleged that the Chief Minister's "protest now is purely political". "BJP supports Telangana judges' protest and the injustice being meted out to them. CM KCR is equally responsible for not acting on time, while the provisional list was in process.” // Meeru kuda congress laga kcr tana tandana ante oopukuni pothunnaru. cong ni M guXXX meeku chesthadu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 how dattanna can ask center to divide HC as soon as possible. He dont now for next 10 year it is united as per the rules. dattanna i hate you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KvrReddy Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 CBN ante su suu posukuntunnaru gaa XXXXXXX..Most powerful person.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopi089 Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 Why cannot this apply for 9 and 10 sections instutions. First let them give share in those on population basis then ap will think about high court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuvNTR Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 Why cannot this apply for 9 and 10 sections instutions. First let them give share in those on population basis then ap will think about high court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ntrforever Posted June 28, 2016 Share Posted June 28, 2016 Why cannot this apply for 9 and 10 sections instutions. First let them give share in those on population basis then ap will think about high court Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.