Jump to content

MCR

Members
  • Content Count

    19
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About MCR

  • Rank
    New Fan

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Guntur West became volatile after YSRC and JS was started. Kanna also spoiled the political dynamics of the constituency. Better Lokesh pick any rural constituency where he improved the situation considerably in last 2 years. He must be connected to rural mass better than city folks if he wants to have long political career. City voters are more fickle and irresponsible than rural voters.
  2. MCR

    2019 AP elections

    These elections proved to AP people that everyone(BJP, TRS, YSRCP and JS) is against CBN except Congress which is non-existing in AP. These elections also proved that our opposition leaders Jagan and Pawan are hand in glove with KCR and Modi. And that our opposition leaders are puppets and don’t dare to stand against KCR or Modi in politics. And that also proves that they are no match to KCR in protecting interests of the state. When KCR n Co vehemently criticized CBN saying he wrote 30 letters to stop Telangana projects, no opposition leader from AP has guts to defend the CM of AP or AP state by saying the letters are not against Telangana. The letters are to make sure AP dont loose its rightful share being tailend state. When these idiots don’t even contest in Telangana, what is there for them to lose in giving counter to TRS. In fact, they would have scored well in AP. Such shameless scumbugs! Even a hardcore Telangana person would laugh at these useless Jagan n Pawan. TDP has nothing more to lose in Telangana now. And it has to expose in AP in broad daylight how our opposition leaders colluded and have no interest in AP’s future except for politics and power. CBN has done better in these four years than in his last term. The best any CM could do for a state like us. And better than any CM right now. He has his work to showcase but its upto him and his supporters how they can together expose opposition’s impotency well. For CBN has seen worse battles being in opposition for 10 years than just losing in Telangana now. He is a strong leader and will sail through this in no time. Keep calm and support him.
  3. @Bollu @whoami Yesterday, I bought Himalayan brand' millets from Indian Grocery store. 2lb packet costs $5. The cheapest option I found so far. I could find Foxtail, Barnyard and Little Millet varieties. There is another brand Mannat selling 1lb packets.
  4. @AndhraBullodu Ya, 24 Mantra vi expensive. Kaani anni paraboiled kaadu. They have paraboiled and non-paraboiled too.
  5. @LION_NTR 24 Mantra brand millets are available in Indian Stores. Im looking for more options
  6. I noticed India map shared by someone that shows mobile manufacturing state wise. Can you please share or post it here?
  7. MCR

    Krishnapatnam Port ,Nellore

    Another thing is intention. CBN didn't start these ports or other infrastructure projects to mint money for himself. On the other hand, YSR did start Polavaram but his intention and the way he executed them was different.
  8. MCR

    Krishnapatnam Port ,Nellore

    No doubt it is vision and work of CBN in the first place, that is bearing the fruits now. If he didn't do it, it would have taken few more decades. It is actually in resonance with his Vision 2020 to improve AP infrastructure drastically, he went aggressive about roads and ports. It adds to confusion that unlike kakinada and gangavaram ports, krishnapatnam guys didn't mention the history in their website. http://www.gangavaram.com/about-port.htm http://kakinadaseaports.in/?page_id=6 Another source that mentions brief story of KPCL https://www.bseindia.com/downloads/ipo/200933116251KPCL-Disclosure Document -Final.pdf In consonance with the programme of liberalization, State Government of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP) had invited bids from private sector parties for the development of four minor ports in the State, including Krishnapatnam Port, on Build, Operate, Share & Transfer (BOST) basis. GoAP accepted the offer for development of Krishnapatnam Port by the NATCO group-led consortium. GoAP & the NATCO Group of Companies have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in this regard on March 10, 1996. On 15th March 1996, NATCO Group of Companies incorporated Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. (KPCL) as a Special Purpose Company (SPC) for the development of the Port. Subsequently the Concession Agreement (CA) was executed between GoAP & KPCL on January 4, 1997. KPCL requested GoAP for certain amendments in agreement in order to make the project bankable and in line with other port concessions given to private developers in the state. GoAP has agreed to certain amendments to the agreement dtd. 04/01/1997. GoAP has approved the DPR on 25/06/1999. The DPR was revised by KPCL and submitted to GoAP on 07/04/2003. Subsequently, the revised CA was executed between KPCL & GoAP on September 17, 2004. Subsequently, the NAVAYUGA Group has joined the consortium as a majority partner. Another source: http://media1.autohaus.de/fm/3576/9909991394updateportsector.pdf 2.4.7.3 Status of Privatized Ports (i) Kakinada Deep Water Port was privatized in March 1999 to M/S ISPL on OMST terms for 20 years. (ii) Krishnapatnam Port was privatized in Jan 1997 on BOOT terms to M/S Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd.(NATCO) for 30 years. Revised agreement was signed on 17-9-2004. Navayuga Engineering Company has taken 74% equity stake in KPCL and NATCO 26%. (iii) Gangavaram Port was privatized in August, 2003 for development of Deep Water Port on BOOT terms initially for 30 years. The port has started handling cargo.
×